Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1969 Chevy Camaro 39k Orig.mileage!! Matching Numbers X44 A/c on 2040-cars

Year:1969 Mileage:39301 Color: Green /
 Green
Location:

Spencerport, New York, United States

Spencerport, New York, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:V-8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:

Used

Year
: 1969
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Camaro
Trim: VINYL
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Drive Type: REAR
Mileage: 39,301
Sub Model: X44
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: Green
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Green

LISTING FOR A FRIEND IS THIS ORIGINAL 1969 CHEVY CAMARO WITH 39K DOCUMENTED ORIGINAL MILES. IT HAS HAD ORIGINAL CODE 59 FROST GREEN REPAINT IN THE 80'S ALONG WITH A FACTORY CORRECT REAR SPOILER. THE PAINT SHOWS VERY WELL WITH A FEW SMALL DINGS AND MINOR SCRATCHES SHOWN IN PICTURES. THE CAR HAS ALL MATCHING NUMBERS DRIVE TRAIN INCLUDING A SMOOTH RUNNING V-8 307 ENGINE, EASY SHIFTING AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION AND 10 BOLT REAR END, POWER STEERING, POWER BRAKES, CONVERTED WORKING FACTORY AIR CONDITIONING AND TINTED WINDOWS.THE ORIGINAL INTERIOR IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION(SMALL TEAR IN HEADREST SEAM) WITH VERY LITTLE WEAR AND EVERYTHING WORKS EVEN THE DOOR BUZZER. THIS CAR NOW HAS AFTERMARKET CHEVY BOWTIE AM/FM CASS. BUT WILL COME WITH A FACTORY AM RADIO. THE TRUNK, FLOORS, ROCKERS, SUB FRAME, SHOCK TOWERS ARE ALL IN EXCELLENT CONDITION WITH NO PATCHES OR REPAIRS. THE FACTORY RIMS HAVE NEWLY MOUNTED 215-75-14 RADIAL TIRES ALONG WITH NEW CORRECT AFTERMARKET DUAL EXHAUST. THIS HIGHLY DOCUMENTED CAR COMES WITH COPY OF ORIGINAL TENNESSEE TITLE, REGISTRATION APPLICATION, OWNER'S MANUAL, PRO-TECTO PLATE, WARRANTY BOOKLET, ORIGINAL KEY CUT OUTS AND CODES. THIS CAR WAS PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY A PGA GOLFER. THIS CAR IS  GREAT EXAMPLE OF A AMERICAN CLASSIC THAT RUNS AND DRIVES LIKE IT LEFT THE SHOWROOM FLOOR IN 1969. I WOULD NOT BE AFRAID TO HAVE YOU FLY IN AND DRIVE HOME. THESE CARS WILL ALWAYS RETAIN THEIR VALUE AND ARE ONLY ORIGINAL ONCE. I CAN BE REACHED AT 585-738-6447 WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. I ENCOURAGE ALL INSPECTIONS INCLUDING 2ND PARTY INSPECTIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING. PLEASE HAVE ALL MONIES AND DECISION MAKERS IN ORDER PRIOR TO BIDDING.I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO END AUCTION EARLY AS CAR WILL BE LISTED LOCALLY AS WELL. PLEASE CONTACT ME PRIOR TO BIDDING IF YOU HAVE 0 OR MULTIPLE NEGATIVE FEEDBACK.THANKS AND GOOD LUCK.

Auto Services in New York

Whitesboro Frame & Body Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 1430 Lincoln Ave, Washington-Mills
Phone: (315) 735-6360

Used-Car Outlet ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: East-Rochester
Phone: (585) 645-8895

US Petroleum ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 465 Nassau Ave, Roosevelt
Phone: (929) 224-0634

Transitowne Misibushi ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 7428 Transit Rd, Lockport
Phone: (716) 634-9000

Transitowne Hyundai ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 7420 Transit Rd, Lockport
Phone: (716) 634-3000

Tirri Motor Cars ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 1 Orange Ave, Suffern
Phone: (845) 533-4400

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Chevy Volt 'acceptable,' Nissan Leaf 'poor' in new IIHS safety tests

Thu, Jul 31 2014

Ford C-Max Hybrid also scored "acceptable" rating. With US Nissan Leaf sales up almost 30 percent during the first half of the year, the only thing that might be able to stop the battery-electric vehicle is a good, stiff barrier. Unfortunately, thing's aren't always pretty when that happens in the real world, according to new tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Things with the Chevrolet Volt extended-range plug-in are a little bit rosier, though. The two plug-in vehicles were part of a batch of a dozen vehicles that just went through the IIHS's "small overlap" test, in which the driver's side front corner of the vehicle is crashed into a rigid barrier at 40 miles per hour. Out of the dozen, only the Mini Cooper Countryman was given a "good" rating. Five vehicles, including the Volt and the Ford C-Max Hybrid, were rated "acceptable," two were "marginal" and two, including the Leaf, were "poor." Plug-in vehicles are unique in the crash-test context because of their relatively large battery sizes. In the Volt's case, the driver had a "low risk" of injury, said the IIHS. But the Leaf's crash substantially pushed back the instrument panel and steering column, creating a scenario where the driver was "likely" to sustain leg injuries. The batteries in both the Leaf and the Volt passed safety tests specifically targeted at things like thermo and electrical properties and overall integrity. "Nissan is proud of the Leaf's 'Good' rating in all other IIHS tests, a 4-star NCAP rating from NHTSA and its IIHS Top Safety Pick rating in all previous years since the car's release," the company said in an e-mail sent to AutoblogGreen. "As for the performance of the 2014 Leaf in the 'small overlap frontal test,' Nissan will continue to review these and other results from the IIHS 'small overlap frontal test' as we seek opportunities for improvement." Check out the IIHS's press release and small car crash-test video footage below. Range of ratings: Small car ratings run the gamut in challenging small overlap front test The Mini Cooper Countryman is the only small car to earn a good rating among the latest group of 12 cars subjected to the Institute's small overlap front crash test. Two electric models and a hybrid also are in the mix, with varied results. The electric-powered Chevrolet Volt (with a gasoline engine "range extender") earns an acceptable rating, while its battery-electric rival, the Nissan Leaf, earns a poor rating.

GM files to trademark name Badlands

Mon, Feb 23 2015

If you've been hoping for General Motors to come out swinging at the Ford F-150 Raptor, we've had some tantalizing news for you of late. Last month we brought you a report that indicated GM has trademarked the name "Z71 Trail Boss," suggesting a potential hardcore off-roader. Now it seems the General has filed for a potentially even better name. That name, as our friends over at GM Authority have discovered, is "Badlands." The application, filed on February 16, indicates that it's for a truck, but of course it doesn't specify just what form it would take... or for that matter, under which division it would fall. So we could, in theory, be looking at the nameplate for a Raptor rival from Chevy or GMC (like the 2011 Sierra All Terrain HD concept pictured here), or for some other trim level, a concept truck, a special edition... just about anything. Heck, it could be for a Vauxhall, Opel or Holden for all we know at this point. Or GM could choose not to use it on anything at all, but here's hoping it'll emerge as something awesome in US showrooms sometime soon. Featured Gallery 2011 Detroit: GMC Sierra All Terrain Concept News Source: GM AuthorityImage Credit: Copyright 2015 AOL Government/Legal Chevrolet GM GMC Truck Off-Road Vehicles trademark