1968 Chevrolet Camaro on 2040-cars
Palo Cedro, California, United States
ENGINE
Type: '70 Chevrolet
Cylinder Block: 454 ci, stock bore/stroke
Crank Shaft: Moldex, internally balanced
Connecting Rods: Chevrolet LS6 with 7/16-inch bolts
Pistons: Chevrolet LS6, 10.0:1 compression ratio
Camshaft: Comp Cams, 248/294 degrees duration at 0.050, Comp Cams 3/8-inch pushrods, double roller timing chain
Oiling System: Modified with custom Milodon oilpan and Blueprinted Pump
Cylinder Heads: Ported Chevrolet iron oval port, 122cc combusion chambers, 2.19/1.88 valves, Comp Cams roller
rockers and valve springs, 10-degree valve stem locks
Induction: Edelbrock Victor Junior oval, Holly 800 CFM carb
Ignition: MSD Pro-Billet HEI
Exhaust: Modified headers, 3-1/2 inch exhaust system, X-Pipe, FlowMaster mufflers
Built By: Dan Keversan
Output: 550 HP at 6,000 RPM
Performance: 11.18/124 (4.11:1), 11.40 /119 (3.73:1) and 11.60/117 (3.50:1)
Top Speed: 165 mph
DRIVETRAIN
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600, 5-speed
Clutch: 10,000 RPM, Drag-Racing Clutch and Flywheel Assembly with Kevlar Disc
Drive Shaft: Steel, shortened by BSI
Rear Axle: Ford 9-inch narrowed 3.65:1 with Detroit Posi Unit, Pinion Support, Moser 31-spline axleshafts
CHASSIS
Front Suspension: ’85 Corvette spindles, Afco upper arms, Afco lower strut rods, frame sectioned for more
favorable Ackerman angle, Koni coilover 650 lb-in springs, 1-inch anti-sway bar, fabricated crossmember, sectioned
rails, engine plate
Rear Suspension: Tubular back-half, Koni coilover 225 lb-in springs, 3-link with locator bar mounted via bearing at
rear axle
Steering: Converted to front-steer, 21-inch BRT power rack, 12:1 ratio
Brakes: Baer Racing 13-inch front, 11-inch rear, Afoco dual master cylinder
Other: Weight distribution, front to rear 50.5/49.5, no bumpsteer through 4-inch travel, 1.5-inch scrub radius,
22-point rollcage, engine relocated rearward
WHEELS & TIRES
Wheels: Budnick 11x17, 13x17
Tires: Kumho ECSTA-XS Front 275/40 ZR, Rear 335/35 ZR
INTERIOR
Seats: ’93 Z28, black and gray cloth by Auto Trim & Glass
Dashboard: Stock with Auto Meter gauges, no air conditioning
Steering Wheel: Grant
BODY & PAINT
Modifications: Fiberglas hood and decklid, wheel opening of front fenders raised and widened, DuPont Maroon
Urethane Paint by Weight Autobody
Weight: 3,150 pound class minimum; 2,825 pounds dry
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
1969 chevrolet camaro z28(US $20,300.00)
1970 chevrolet camaro rs(US $18,970.00)
1968 chevrolet camaro(US $17,430.00)
1969 chevrolet camaro(US $24,500.00)
1969 chevrolet camaro(US $22,400.00)
1969 chevrolet camaro silver w red stripe(US $24,185.00)
Auto Services in California
Your Car Valet ★★★★★
Xpert Auto Repair ★★★★★
Woodcrest Auto Service ★★★★★
Witt Lincoln ★★★★★
Winton Autotech Inc. ★★★★★
Winchester Auto ★★★★★
Auto blog
The U-2 spy plane needs high-performance cars to help land
Thu, Oct 15 2015Typically, aircraft deploy their landing gear from three main points. Most military aircraft, for example, deploy two gears at the back and one forward, like a tricycle. Some civilian aircraft flip the layout, with two in front and one in back - tail-draggers. The U-2 Dragon Lady is wildly different than any of these. With a 103-foot wingspan but a body that's just 63-feet long, the layout of the U-2 makes a traditional landing setup infeasible. Instead, the U-2 utilizes a pair of wheels, one up front and one in back. With such a bizarre layout, landings are so tough that since the U-2's earliest flights at Area 51, the US Air Force has used high-performance chase cars to guide the pilot down safely. The landing process isn't over there, though. As this video from Sploid shows, balancing out the aircraft to fit the detachable "pogos" – think training wheels for spy planes – is a comical procedure requiring a number of airman using their full body weight to even out the U-2. This video also recaps some of the great vehicles that have served as chase vehicles for this legendary spy plane. They include Chevrolet El Caminos, and the Fox-body Ford Mustangs so favored by the California Highway Patrol. For the last several years, the USAF has utilized products from General Motors, using fourth-generation Chevy Camaros, before switching over to the Pontiac GTO and most recently, the awesome Pontiac G8. It's fair to say that if you're a gearhead in the Air Force, this is the job you want. Check out the video, embedded up top. News Source: Sploid via YouTubeImage Credit: Sploid Chevrolet Ford GM Pontiac Military Performance Videos
Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test
Tue, Oct 25 2016The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video:
GM raises 2023 guidance on strong sales, higher profits
Tue, Apr 25 2023General Motors beat first-quarter profit estimates and raised its full-year earnings and cash-flow guidance after vehicle demand at the start of the year surpassed expectations. Its shares rose in premarket trading. GM made $2.21 a share in adjusted profit in the first quarter, compared to a consensus forecast of $1.72 a share. Revenue rose 11% to $39.99 billion, it said Tuesday, which was more than the $39.24 billion analysts expected. The stronger results stem from rising sales in the US, even in the face of higher interest rates and inflation. GM executives said demand was strong enough to revise 2023 guidance upward, boosting profit estimates for the year by $500 million to between $11 billion and $13 billion. “We did it with strong production and inventory discipline and consistent pricing,” GM Chief Financial Officer Paul Jacobson said on a call with journalists. “All in all, weÂ’re feeling confident about 2023.” The Detroit automaker raised per-share full-year guidance to between $6.35 and $7.35, up from $6 to $7 a share, and said free cash flow would also increase by $500 million to a range of $5.5 billion to $7.5 billion. GMÂ’s shares pared a gain of as much as 4.4% before the start of regular trading Tuesday, rising 3.5% to $35.50 as of 6:55 a.m. in New York. The stock was up 1.9% for the year as of the close on Monday. North American Strength The automakerÂ’s sales were particularly strong in North America, where first-quarter earnings rose before interest and taxes rose to $3.6 billion. Vehicle sales rose 18% to 707,000 in the region. Jacobson said the company originally expected to sell 15 million vehicles in the US this year, slightly less than the 15.5 million annualized rate automakers foresaw in the first quarter. North American demand was enough to offset a weak performance in China, GMÂ’s second-largest market. The automaker continues to struggle in the country, where its vehicle sales fell 25% to 462,000 vehicles in the quarter. Profits from its joint ventures in the market slumped 65% to $83 million. The market has struggled overall in the wake of Covid-19 restrictions and foreign automakers have had to overcome a growing preference for Chinese brands by competing on price, squeezing profit margins. The situation in China probably wonÂ’t significantly improve until the second half of the year, according to Jacobson. GM remains on target to sell 150,000 electric vehicles this year, the CFO said.