Chevrolet: C-10 1967 Chevy Resto Mod Big Block 454 on 2040-cars
Niceville, Florida, United States
1967 Chevrolet Resto Mod Small Window Cab Stepside C-10 Pickup
UNDER THE HOOD: General Motors Performance Parts (GMPP) 454 HO Crate Engine 425 HP / 500 Ft/Lbs TQ. This motor comes from GM with a 8.75 to 1 Compression Ratio, Forged crank, rods and pistons and a mild roller performance camshaft. The truck is fitted with a new heavy duty four row radiator, a GM serpentine belt system, Hedman Ceramic Coated Long Tube Headers, Holley 750 4 barrel carb, new GM HEI distributor, high volume fuel pump and a K&N Air Filter. Nearly everything else under the hood is new! The transmission is a completely rebuilt 700R4 Overdrive unit with a performance rebuild. The truck has power steering, power brakes and completely new modern air conditioning system . The truck has been rewired bumper to bumper with a new Painless Performance Wiring Harness. The dual exhaust is completely new with turbo style mufflers. This truck sounds great but is not overly loud. INTERIOR: All New Interior! Radio is modern technology with an old school look that plays MP3 thru a USB connection. The truck has a new GM tilt column with proper overdrive transmission shift indicator. New carpet and the seat has been reupholstered. Complete new custom air conditioning system that uses the original factory vents and factory dash controls. Truck has a new factory tachometer dash. TRUCK BED: $5,000 spent on new sheet metal. New oak boards stained and sealed. Comes with Tonneau Cover to protect bed. REAR END: Completely rebuilt GM 12 bolt with new 3.42 gears and Eaton posi-traction unit. FUEL TANK: Relocated from behind seat to the rear of the truck behind the rear axle and fuel filler has been relocated to the driver's side rear fender. BRAKES: All new 4 wheel disc brakes. Stainless steel brake lines. TIRES: New 255-60-15 BFG Radial T/As on all 4 corners mounted to 6 lug 8" wide steel wheels SUSPENSION: All new everything! New springs, new bushing, new shocks, new front end hardware. Lowered 2 and a half inches in the front and 4 inches in the rear.
A very nice frame off ground up restoration with fresh paint and less than 2,000 miles since completion. Over $30k in new parts alone on this truck! Factor in the hours spent, the fresh paint and the price of a good truck to start the project with and you are looking at nearly $40k to duplicate this truck. Absolutely no rust and no bondo anywhere. Runs and Drives Excellent! |
Chevrolet C-10 for Sale
Auto Services in Florida
Zephyrhills Auto Repair ★★★★★
Yimmy`s Body Shop & Auto Repair ★★★★★
WRD Auto Tints ★★★★★
Wray`s Auto Service Inc ★★★★★
Wheaton`s Service Center ★★★★★
Waltronics Auto Care ★★★★★
Auto blog
Meet the Greenest and Meanest vehicles of 2016
Wed, Jan 27 2016If you've been keeping track, you won't be surprised with the number one entry in this year's list of greenest cars from the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). In fact, the top three spots on the 2016 list are all the same as they were in 2015. After that, things get interesting. For one thing, this is the first Greenest list that doesn't have any purely internal combustion engine powertrain on it. Hybrids, yes, but if you want to be one of the top 12 greenest cars this year, you'd better have some sort of electric angle. ACEEE says that the conventional, gas-powered Smart Fortwo and Chevrolet Spark just missed the cut. In a statement, ACEEE lead vehicle analyst Shruti Vaidyanathan said, "The 2016 scores are in, and plug-in electric vehicles are outpacing all other vehicle offerings in terms of environmental friendliness." Like last year, one of the noticeable vehicles missing from the green list is the Tesla Model S. One reason? ACEEE takes curb weight into account (lighter is better), and the Model S is a heavy beast. The ACEEE doesn't just look at the clean side of the ledger. It also puts out a "meanest" list. These are the vehicles that pollute the most, not only from their tailpipes, but also any pollution created during the entire manufacturing process, from mining the raw materials to the energy used to produce the vehicle at the factory. The entire list, from greenest to meanest, is done using a "cradle to grave" analysis. You can see how the ACEEE determines its rankings here, explore the entire greenest cars site here, or click through our galleries to see which vehicles are extra green (above) or extra mean (below) this year. 12: Mercedes-Benz GL550 4MATIC View 12 Photos More Electric Cars than Ever on Greenest Vehicles List Electric Vehicles Nab 9 out of Top 12 Spots in ACEEE's Environmental Vehicle Rankings Washington, DC: Despite a tumultuous year for the automotive industry, manufacturers have continued to offer exciting technology options for a growing vehicle market. Today at greenercars.org, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) released its 19th annual comprehensive environmental ratings for vehicles. The following vehicles comprise the Greenest List for 2016: Greenest Score 1. Mercedes-Benz Smart ForTwo Electric Drive Convertible / Coupe 63 2. Chevrolet Spark EV 63 3. Fiat 500E 62 4. Toyota Prius Eco 61 5. Volkswagen E-Golf 61 6. Nissan Leaf S / Leaf SV 61 7. Kia Soul Electric 59 8.
Next Corvette ZR1 to get 700 horsepower?
Tue, 19 Feb 2013Word has it General Motors may offer as much as 700 horsepower in the C7 Corvette ZR1. Motor Trend reports the next Corvette Z06 will continue to rely on its naturally aspirated 7.0-liter V8 engine for thrust, but the lump will deliver substantially more power. How much more? MT says the engine could deliver up to 600 ponies. That's a jump of 95 horsepower over the current Z06, though no figures have been finalized as of yet. Right now, GM is reportedly waiting to see what sort of grunt it can glean from the next ZR1.
The automaker has already made it clear it will resurrect the LT5 name for the new supercharged V8, and if GM is already pulling 600 from the Z06, the big dog ZR1 would theoretically offer 700 horsepower. Either way, the range-topping Corvette will be suitably insulated from its less potent siblings. Stay tuned. We aren't likely to see the Z06 for at least a year, with the ZR1 trailing along at some point there after.
GM won't really kill off the Chevy Volt and Cadillac CT6, will it?
Fri, Jul 21 2017General Motors is apparently considering killing off six slow-selling models by 2020, according to Reuters. But is that really likely? The news is mentioned in a story where UAW president Dennis Williams notes that slumping US car sales could threaten jobs at low-volume factories. Still, we're skeptical that GM is really serious about killing those cars. Reuters specifically calls out the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Sonic, and the Chevrolet Volt. Most of these have been redesigned or refreshed within the past few model years. Four - the LaCrosse, Impala, CT6, and Volt - are built in the Hamtramck factory in Detroit. That plant has made only 35,000 cars this year - down 32 percent from 2016. A typical GM plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year. Of all the cars Williams listed, killing the XTS, Impala, and Sonic make the most sense. They're older and don't sell particularly well. On the other hand, axing the other three seems like an odd move. It would leave Buick and Cadillac without flagship sedans, at least until the rumored Cadillac CT8 arrives. The CT6 was a big investment for GM and backing out after just a few years would be a huge loss. It also uses GM's latest and best materials and technology, making us even more skeptical. The Volt is a hugely important car for Chevrolet, and supplementing it with a crossover makes more sense than replacing it with one. Offering one model with a range of powertrain variants like the Hyundai Ioniq and Toyota Prius might be another route GM could take. All six of these vehicles are sedans, Yes, crossover sales are booming, but there's still a huge market for cars. Backing away from these would be essentially giving up sales to competitors from around the globe. The UAW might simply be publicly pushing GM to move crossover production to Hamtramck to avoid closing the plant and laying off workers. Sales of passenger cars are down across both GM and the industry. Consolidating production in other plants and closing Hamtramck rather than having a single facility focus on sedans might make more sense from a business perspective. GM is also trying to reduce its unsold inventory, meaning current production may be slowed or halted while current cars move into customer hands. There's a lot of politics that goes into building a car. GM wants to do what makes the most sense from a business perspective, while the UAW doesn't workers to lose their jobs when a factory closes.