1972 Chevrolet C-10 Truck, Runs And Drives Great 350 V8 Auto Trans on 2040-cars
Marysville, Washington, United States
Up for sale 1972 Chevrolet C-10, Runs great, shifts great, Power steering and brakes, This 350 runs strong and uses no oil, Trans I think is a turbo 350, it shifts great no slipping or funny noises. Lights, heater, wipers ect work, windows and doors work well. This truck has gas tank behind seat and under bed with two gas gauges switch on dash switches tanks. New battery. Windshield is cracked all other glass is good, seat is in good condition, appears to be no rust in floors, rust in bed and rocker, little in door bottoms, dent near rear bumper. I found all the parts required to repair rust at Classic Industries for about $700.00. Over all great truck as daily driver or for a few more dollars will make it a very nice truck. Tires are in fair condition. No warranty, winner pays for shipping. I can deliver within Washington state for a fee to be agreed upon after sale. Truck goes no place until all funds clear bank, NO ERROR IN LISTING I CHANGED FORMAT. EBAY LISTED IT AS ERROR.
On Jan-05-14 at 16:13:36 PST, seller added the following information: I have listed this truck for sale locally and other places so this auction could end without any notice. $ 4000.00 will buy it now. Call John 425 238-5232 |
Chevrolet C-10 for Sale
1970 chevrolet c-10 honorable mention mcoty, roadster shop built(US $85,000.00)
1969 chevrolet c10 swb (short bed)(US $8,500.00)
1969 chevrolet c10 pickup base 5.7l
1972 chevy c-10 short box step side
72 chevy cheyenne super c10 unmolested, time capsule 1/2 ton long bed no reserve
1971 chevrolet c10 pickup hot rod rat rod shop truck
Auto Services in Washington
We Love Transmissions ★★★★★
Triple T Auto Repair ★★★★★
TOS Used Tires and Accessories ★★★★★
Top Performance Auto Inc. ★★★★★
Tc Auto Sales ★★★★★
Sun City Auto Supply ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM seeks national mandate for zero-emissions cars
Fri, Oct 26 2018DETROIT — General Motors says it will ask the federal government for one national gas mileage standard, including a requirement that a percentage of auto companies' sales be zero-emissions vehicles. Mark Reuss, GM's executive vice president of product development, said the company will propose that a certain percentage of nationwide sales be made up of vehicles that run on electricity or hydrogen fuel cells. GM says a nationwide program modeled on such a requirement in California could result in 7 million electric vehicles, or EVs, on U.S. roads by 2030. California wants 15.4 percent of vehicle sales by 2025 to be EVs or other zero emission vehicles. Nine other states, including Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York, have adopted those requirements. In January, California Governor Jerry Brown set a target of 5 million zero-emission vehicles in California by 2030. The Trump administration criticizes California's ZEV mandate, saying it requires automakers to spend tens of billions of dollars developing vehicles that most consumers do not want, only to sell them at a loss. Reuss told reporters that governments and industries in Asia and Europe "are working together to enact policies now to hasten the shift to an all-electric future. It's very simple: America has the opportunity to lead in the technologies of the future." A national mandate also would create jobs and reduce fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and "make EVs more affordable," Reuss added. GM, the nation's largest automaker, will spell out the request Friday in written comments on a Trump administration proposal to roll back Obama-era fuel economy and emissions standards, freezing them at 2020 levels instead of gradually making them tougher. Under a regulation finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency at the end of the Obama administration, the fleet of new automobiles would have to get 36 miles per gallon by 2025, 10 mpg higher than the current requirement. But the Trump administration's preferred plan is to freeze the standards starting in 2021. Administration officials say waiving the tougher fuel efficiency requirements would make vehicles more affordable, which would get safer cars into consumer hands more quickly. GM on Thursday said it doesn't support the freeze, but wants flexibility to deal with consumers' shift from cars to less-efficient SUVs and trucks.
GM recalls full-size truck, SUVs and vans over faulty shifter mechanism
Mon, 07 Jan 2013Twelve different General Motors vehicles from the 2013 model year, up to 54,686 units in total, are being recalled over two potential issues with their steering columns. The models in question, all full-size trucks, SUVs or vans, are the: Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, Escalade EXT, Chevrolet Avalanche, Express, Silverado, Suburban, Tahoe, and GMC Savana, Sierra, Yukon and Yukon XL.
The affected vehicles were built with a fractured parking lock cable or "a malformed steering column lock actuator gear in the lock module assembly." As a consequence, they could shift out of park without the brake pedal being applied or with the key removed or in the off position.
A bulletin from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration indicates that the recall should begin on January 17. GM will notify owners, at which time they can take their vehicles to their dealers for repair free of charge. Have a look at the bulletin below for more information.
Chevy Trax engineer says GMC version possible
Mon, Dec 8 2014The Buick Encore is doing so well and its platform-mate the Chevrolet Trax has such good reviewer vibes going for it already, that a GMC version hasn't been ruled out. During the recent press launch, Automotive News asked lead engineer Al Manzor if the Trax could wear a GMC-branded suit, to which Manzor replied, "I think that is certainly possible." That's a long way from telling us anything about the probability of a GMC version of the Trax, and a legion of questions would need to be answered before it could happen. How would a GMC version be priced to leave room for the $26,465 GMC Terrain but not eat into sales of the $20,995 Trax or the $24,035 Encore? Or would that matter? Could it primarily be considered to encourage a new faction of The Yukon Set at the compact end, GMC buyers being famously committed to the marque? And of course, would there be a Denali version? It'll probably be a long while before we have any kind of answers, but if you want to see it happen, the door to your campaign of persuasion is at least ajar.