Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Chevy C-10 Step-side Pickup on 2040-cars

Year:1966 Mileage:68000 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Nampa, Idaho, United States

Nampa, Idaho, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:4-speed manual
Body Type:Step-side
Engine:292 cubic inch
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1966
Interior Color: Blue
Make: Chevrolet
Number of Cylinders: Six
Model: C-10
Trim: Step-side
Drive Type: Two wheel drive
Mileage: 68,000
Exterior Color: Blue
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

292    6-CYL    4-SPEED.   68,000 ORIGINAL MILES, ENGINE OVERHAULED AT 64,000 MILES. RUNS GREAT. ALL ORIGINAL. MATCHING SERIAL NUMBERS. ORIGINAL BUILD SHEET AND ORIGINAL INVOICE AS SEEN IN PICTURES.  WITHIN THE LAST 3,000 MILES THE BRAKES, SHOCKS AND CLUTCH WERE REPLACED. THE TRANSMISSION WAS INSPECTED AND FOUND TO BE SOUND.


 DAMAGED DRIVER'S DOOR, REPLACEMENT DOOR INCLUDED.  THIS WAS A RANCH TRUCK, QUARTER PANELS HAVE SOME DENTS & DINGS, VERY LITTLE RUST.  GOOD RESTORATION PROJECT.

 I AM THE SECOND OWNER.  TRUCK WAS PURCHASED IN SANDPOINT, IDAHO, FROM FRIEND WHO WAS ORIGINAL OWNER.   CALL 208-610-1377 FOR MORE INFORMATION.

$500 DEPOSIT DUE  WITHIN 48 HOURS OF AUCTION CLOSE, BALANCE DUE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS OF AUCTION CLOSE.
PAYPAL OR CASHIER'S CHECK ONLY.

BUYER RESPONSIBLE FOR VEHICLE PICK-UP OR SHIPPING.

Auto Services in Idaho

Spokane Sunscreen Window Tntng ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 11421 E Sprague Ave, Hauser
Phone: (509) 928-2414

Silverlake Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 274 W Hanley Ave, Post-Falls
Phone: (208) 772-6081

Robinson Auto Glass Experts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Windshield Repair
Address: 495 1st St, Shelley
Phone: (208) 534-9974

Recovery Masters Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Construction & Building Equipment
Address: 55 N Cedar St, Worley
Phone: (208) 777-9848

Jordan Wholesale ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Tractor Dealers, Farm Equipment
Address: 3200 W Seltice Way, Rathdrum
Phone: (208) 777-0234

Bonanza Motors Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 325 Overland Ave, Paul
Phone: (208) 678-1234

Auto blog

Looking back at the Citation IV concept that likely shaped the GM EV1

Wed, Aug 20 2014

Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it. We're not sure how that applies to the GM EV1, but we'd still like to share something from Autoline Daily, an online automotive new show with our friend John McElroy. He's been covering the business for decades now and recently found something interesting: pictures of the 1984 Chevrolet Citation IV concept, seen above. Displayed half a decade before the first electric concept that would become the EV1 (inset), McElroy says it's now clear that the elegant, aerodynamic EV1 took a lot of styling cues from the Citation IV, which was developed in part thanks to GM's new-at-the-time Aerodynamics Laboratory. We agree with him that the spats over the rear wheels, the flush glass, and the covered headlights all bear a certain kind of similarity between the two cars. That the colors almost match is a nice coincidence. The Impact (the concept version of the EV1) looked "frumpier," McElroy says, because it wasn't as long as the Citation. You can read a lot more about the Citation IV here and check out McElroy's thoughts in the video below. Find the Citation starting at around 3:45. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.

Nissan Leaf sets new November sales record, Chevy Volt drops again

Tue, Dec 2 2014

When you talk to people in the plug-in vehicle industry, one theme you hear repeatedly is that the more plug-in cars that are out there, the better things are for everyone. One reason is that more EVs build a need for more public chargers, and more chargers mean more people see that plugging in is feasible. But there's still something to be said for old-fashioned competition, and in the sales race between the two long-running plug-in vehicles in the US, the Nissan Leaf is resoundingly beating the Chevy Volt for 2014. In fact, it won't be long before the EV's cumulative sales top the PHEV's. But that's a topic for another month. For now, we have the sales results from November. Unsurprisingly, Nissan set another monthly record (that is, the best Leaf sales in any November, the 22nd time in a row we've seen a monthly record) with 2,687 sales last month. That's up 34 percent over last November and up 35 percent year-to-date. Toby Perry, Nissan's director of electric vehicle marketing, said in a statement that, "Our 'Kick Gas' ad campaign and 'No Charge to Charge' launch in Chicago and Atlanta drove an increase in November Leaf sales. Even with gas prices falling across the country, consumers appreciate that the cost of driving a Nissan Leaf is still a fraction of that of a gas-powered car." Over on the Chevy side of the ledger, there were 1,336 Volt sales last month, down 30.4 percent from the 1,920 sold in November 2013. So far this year, Volt sales are down 16.4 percent and Chevy has sold 17,315 Volts in 2014. As we said last month, the Volt slump might be due to people waiting on the new version to make an appearance at the Detroit Auto Show next month before going on sale in the second half of 2015. So far in 2014, Nissan has sold 27,098 Leafs. Look for our detailed post of US green car sales in the near future. Until then, please discuss last month's Leaf and Volt sale in the comments, below. News Source: Nissan, General Motors Green Chevrolet Nissan Electric Hybrid PHEV ev sales hybrid sales

IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving

Tue, Oct 11 2022

WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.