1964 Chevrolet C10 Swb Fleetside Pickup Truck Project-custom Cab-big Back Glass on 2040-cars
Eads, Tennessee, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Make: Chevrolet
Drive Type: AUTOMATIC
Model: C-10
Mileage: 111,111
Trim: CUSTOM CAB
YOU ARE BIDDING ON A 1964 CHEVROLET C-10 SWB FLEETSIDE CUSTOM CAB W/BIG BACK GLASS PROJECT, SAME OWNER 39 YEARS, ARKANSAS TRUCK ALL OF IT'S LIFE, 350CI ENGINE, ALUMINUM INTAKE, HEADERS, HOLLEY CARB, M/T ALUMINUM VALVECOVERS, RUNS AND DRIVES BUT NEEDS A GOOD TUNE-UP, AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, THE WORSE PART ABOUT THIS TRUCK IS THE LOWER ROCKER PANELS AND PASSENGER SIDE DOOR, NEEDS BODYWORK, SOME CAB CORNER RUST HOWEVER THIS TRUCK IS NOT ALL CRUSTY AND RUSTY UNDERNEATH LIKE SOMETHING FROM THE EAST COAST THAT WAS DRIVEN ON SALTY ROADS (SEE PICS) FRAME IS SOLID AND CLEAN, WINDSHIELD IS CRACKED, ORIGINAL BLUE TRUCK FROM THE FACTORY, OVERALL A GOOD PROJECT TRUCK THAT CAN BE FIXED UP BY A SKILLED BODYMAN, GREAT FATHER/SON/DAUGHTER FIXER-UPPER TO RESTORE BACK AS ORIGINAL OR BUILD IT LIKE YOU WANT, MANY POSSIBILITIES WITH THIS ONE AND THIS TRUCK CAN BE BOUGHT RIGHT HERE ON EBAY FOR A REASONABLE RESERVE, SOLD IN AS IS CONDITION, BIDDERS WITH ZERO/NEGATIVE FEEDBACK MUST CONTACT ME BEFORE BIDDING OR I WILL CANCEL YOUR BID/BIDS, THANKS FOR LOOKING.
NOTE: I ALSO HAVE A VERY SOLID AND 99% RUSTFREE CAB (PICTURED) THAT CAN BE PURCHASED FOR EXTRA $$ IF INTERESTED. THIS CAB IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS AUCTION.
Chevrolet C-10 for Sale
Auto Services in Tennessee
Wholesale Inc ★★★★★
White & Peels Auto Center ★★★★★
West Broad Auto Sales ★★★★★
Topside Auto Sales ★★★★★
Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★
Stout`s Riverside Auto Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevy Gives World Series MVP Madison Bumgarner A Recalled Truck
Thu, Oct 30 2014Last night must have seemed like a dream come true for San Francisco Giants pitcher Madison Bumgarner. He helped his team win its third World Series Championship in four years, earned MVP status and was given a brand new 2015 Chevrolet Colorado. Bumgarner might want to hold off on taking a victory lap in his new truck however. The Colorado is currently under recall. General Motors issued a stop-delivery order earlier this month to fix the truck's air bag connectors, which were wired improperly during the manufacturing process. The faulty wiring can cause the system to deploy incorrectly. Only 138 customers have received their Chevrolet trucks, the rest were caught and repaired either in the plant or on their way to dealerships and show rooms. Recalls Chevrolet world series
GM issues stop-sale for 3 SUVs over incorrect MPG rating
Fri, May 13 2016This week, GM sent a memo to Chevy, GMC, and Buick dealers to tell them to stop selling three SUVS. The 2016 Chevy Traverse, the GMC Acadia, and the Buick Enclave all have EPA window stickers that show higher fuel economy ratings than the vehicles actually have. Unlike other recent – and very public – fuel economy ratings problems from VW and Mitsubishi, it doesn't seem like GM did anything wrong with the testing for these vehicles, it just misprinted the labels. New labels are being printed and should arrive at dealerships this weekend and early next week. After that, the SUVs will be able to be sold and delivered again. The official fuel economy rating for the three SUVs are all the same. The correct numbers for the all-wheel drive versions are 17 miles per gallon combined, 15 city, and 22 highway. The stickers say the SUVs get 17/24/19. The front-wheel driver models were also incorrectly labeled, and the total number of affected vehicles is 59,823. In the memo, GM said the problem was caused by an "inadvertent error," Automotive News says. GM is working with the EPA to solve the issue. We have asked GM for a comment on the mistake and will update this post if we hear back. Related Gallery 2013 GMC Acadia View 16 Photos News Source: Automotive News – sub. req. Government/Legal Green Buick Chevrolet GM GMC Fuel Efficiency mpg gmc acadia chevy traverse
GM won't really kill off the Chevy Volt and Cadillac CT6, will it?
Fri, Jul 21 2017General Motors is apparently considering killing off six slow-selling models by 2020, according to Reuters. But is that really likely? The news is mentioned in a story where UAW president Dennis Williams notes that slumping US car sales could threaten jobs at low-volume factories. Still, we're skeptical that GM is really serious about killing those cars. Reuters specifically calls out the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Sonic, and the Chevrolet Volt. Most of these have been redesigned or refreshed within the past few model years. Four - the LaCrosse, Impala, CT6, and Volt - are built in the Hamtramck factory in Detroit. That plant has made only 35,000 cars this year - down 32 percent from 2016. A typical GM plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year. Of all the cars Williams listed, killing the XTS, Impala, and Sonic make the most sense. They're older and don't sell particularly well. On the other hand, axing the other three seems like an odd move. It would leave Buick and Cadillac without flagship sedans, at least until the rumored Cadillac CT8 arrives. The CT6 was a big investment for GM and backing out after just a few years would be a huge loss. It also uses GM's latest and best materials and technology, making us even more skeptical. The Volt is a hugely important car for Chevrolet, and supplementing it with a crossover makes more sense than replacing it with one. Offering one model with a range of powertrain variants like the Hyundai Ioniq and Toyota Prius might be another route GM could take. All six of these vehicles are sedans, Yes, crossover sales are booming, but there's still a huge market for cars. Backing away from these would be essentially giving up sales to competitors from around the globe. The UAW might simply be publicly pushing GM to move crossover production to Hamtramck to avoid closing the plant and laying off workers. Sales of passenger cars are down across both GM and the industry. Consolidating production in other plants and closing Hamtramck rather than having a single facility focus on sedans might make more sense from a business perspective. GM is also trying to reduce its unsold inventory, meaning current production may be slowed or halted while current cars move into customer hands. There's a lot of politics that goes into building a car. GM wants to do what makes the most sense from a business perspective, while the UAW doesn't workers to lose their jobs when a factory closes.