1988 K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4 68k Miles Nice Condition 350 V8 on 2040-cars
Adrian, Michigan, United States
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:350
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Blazer
Trim: Silverado
Options: Cassette Player, 4-Wheel Drive, Convertible
Drive Type: 4x4
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 68,200
Exterior Color: Metallic Gray
Interior Color: Gray
1988 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4 350
Need to sell b/c our family is growing. Cannot fit everyone in the Blazer. I really love this truck and always wanted one since my parents bought a new one in 1978. I wanted to restore it and put a 70's front end on it, but plans change and need to find a Suburban.
68K on odometer (previous owner stated it was stored in a barn and used sparingly)
Evidence for mileage includes: original GM floor mats, original GM radio that works, lack of wear on brake pedal, lack of wear in carpet, no cracks in dash, all power options work including windows, A/C blows cold, vehicle DOES NOT LEAK ANY FLUIDS OR OILS, drives straight, etc. But I cannot be 100% b/c some people just take better care of their vehicles than others.
Engine doesn't puff any smoke what-so-ever and doesn't use any oil. It is EXTREMELY SMOOTH!!
Tranny shifts as it should
4x4 works great
New muffler (quiet) and tail pipe
New radiator, water pump, fan clutch, hoses
Possibly will trade for a 3/4 ton Yukon XL or Suburban ONLY
Tires are at about 50% and do not match (was going to put on some meaty BFG's)
Yes it does have some rust starting (see pics) but is very restorable and a dent in the left rear quarter panel (bumper was pushed into it)
Call or text Tom at: (five one seven) 605-8528
Chevrolet Blazer for Sale
1984 chevrolet k5 blazer silverado edition diesel engine rust free no reserve
1997 chevrolet blazer ls sport utility 4-door 4.3l(US $2,799.00)
2002(02) chevrolet blazer ls power locks & windows! runs great! save huge!!!(US $3,995.00)
1979 k5 blazer ls swap
1972 chevrolet k5 blazer 4x4 completely restored like new
1992 chevrolet blazer silverado sport utility 2-door 5.7l(US $5,000.00)
Auto Services in Michigan
Welch Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Wear Master ★★★★★
Walsh`s Service ★★★★★
Vehicle Accessories ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Town And Country Auto Service Center LLC ★★★★★
Auto blog
Junkyard Gem: 1986 Chevrolet Sprint Plus
Fri, Jun 16 2023General Motors sold second- and third-generation Suzuki Cultuses with Geo or Chevrolet Metro badging in the United States from 1989 through 2001 model years, and we've all seen plenty of those cars on the street over the years. The first-generation Cultus was sold here as well, with Chevrolet Sprint badges, and I've found a rare example of the Sprint five-door hatchback in a Northern California car graveyard. The Chevy Sprint first appeared on the West Coast as a 1985 model, then became available everywhere in the United States for the 1986 through 1988 model years (in Canada, it was sold as the Pontiac Firefly). It was available here as a hatchback with three or five doors; for 1986 only, the five-door was badged as the Sprint Plus. Soon enough, The General would be selling many more Asian-built cars with Detroit badges here. Isuzu I-Marks were sold as Chevrolet/Geo Spectrums starting in the 1986 model year, while Daewoo provided the Pontiac LeMans two years later. Under the hood, a 1.0-liter three-cylinder rated at 48 horsepower. The five-door Sprint cost $5,580 in 1986, which was $200 more than the three-door (those prices would be $15,445 and $14,891 in 2023 dollars). I've documented seven discarded Sprints prior to this one (including an extremely rare Turbo Sprint), and all of them were three-doors; we can assume that price was the most important factor for Sprint buyers. Gasoline prices were crashing hard during the middle 1980s, but memories of gas lines and odd-even-day fuel rationing from 1979 remained strong. What cars competed with the '86 Sprint on sticker price? Well, there was no way to undercut the hilariously affordable (and terrible) Yugo GV, which cost $3,990. The much bigger (but still pretty bad) Hyundai Excel listed at $4,995, while Toyota would sell you a sturdy (but zero-fun) Tercel starting at $5,448. Even the wretched Chevy Chevette — yes, it was still available in 1986 — cost $5,645. The original buyer of this car was willing to shell out an extra $395 to get an automatic instead of the base five-speed manual. That's about $1,093 in today's money. This car must have been slow. By the end, the doors were held shut with duct tape, but it still stayed alive until age 37. 53 miles per gallon on the highway! It does everything. The camels of the highway.
Here are a few of our automotive guilty pleasures
Tue, Jun 23 2020It goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway. The world is full of cars, and just about as many of them are bad as are good. It's pretty easy to pick which fall into each category after giving them a thorough walkaround and, more important, driving them. But every once in a while, an automobile straddles the line somehow between good and bad — it may be hideously overpriced and therefore a marketplace failure, it may be stupid quick in a straight line but handles like a drunken noodle, or it may have an interior that looks like it was made of a mess of injection-molded Legos. Heck, maybe all three. Yet there's something special about some bad cars that actually makes them likable. The idea for this list came to me while I was browsing classified ads for cars within a few hundred miles of my house. I ran across a few oddballs and shared them with the rest of the team in our online chat room. It turns out several of us have a few automotive guilty pleasures that we're willing to admit to. We'll call a few of 'em out here. Feel free to share some of your own in the comments below. Dodge Neon SRT4 and Caliber SRT4: The Neon was a passably good and plucky little city car when it debuted for the 1995 model year. The Caliber, which replaced the aging Neon and sought to replace its friendly marketing campaign with something more sinister, was panned from the very outset for its cheap interior furnishings, but at least offered some decent utility with its hatchback shape. What the two little front-wheel-drive Dodge models have in common are their rip-roarin' SRT variants, each powered by turbocharged 2.4-liter four-cylinder engines. Known for their propensity to light up their front tires under hard acceleration, the duo were legitimately quick and fun to drive with a fantastic turbo whoosh that called to mind the early days of turbo technology. — Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski Chevrolet HHR SS: Chevy's HHR SS came out early in my automotive journalism career, and I have fond memories of the press launch (and having dinner with Bob Lutz) that included plenty of tire-smoking hard launches and demonstrations of the manual transmission's no-lift shift feature. The 260-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder was and still is a spunky little engine that makes the retro-inspired HHR a fun little hot rod that works quite well as a fun little daily driver.
Read This: Auto Extremist advocates for Corvette as brand with multiple models [w/poll]
Fri, 25 Jan 2013The 2014 Chevrolet Corvette really grinds Peter De Lorenzo's gears. Or, more accurately, the self-anointed Auto Extremist has an issue with what he sees as mismanagement of the legendary sports car by General Motors executives. In a new editorial on his website, De Lorenzo argues it's time to split Corvette off from Chevrolet to create an all-new brand, complete with a model range with at least three new takes on the sports car. Capable of fully leveraging the successes of the Corvette Racing program and brandishing the full might of GM's technical prowess, the Corvette brand would theoretically give Porsche something to sweat over.
Sure, that sounds like a party, but given GM's troubled track record when it comes to launching (let alone managing) brands, we say that's slippery slope that could just as easily end with the whole Corvette franchise in the scrap bin. Either way, the notion is certainly an interesting one. Head over to Auto Extremist to take in the full editorial, and then let us know what you think in Comments. Should GM split off its most storied nameplate?
View Poll