Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1984 Cucv M1009 on 2040-cars

US $10,500.00
Year:1984 Mileage:51500
Location:

El Paso, Texas, United States

El Paso, Texas, United States
Advertising:
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.2 DETROIT DIESEL
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1G8ED18J9EF107009
Year: 1984
Mileage: 51,500
Make: Chevrolet
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Blazer
Trim: 2 DOOR
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: FOUR WHEEL DRIVE

1984 HEAVY DUTY CHEVROLET BLAZER M1009 (MILITARY BLAZER) FOR SALE.

This tank is powered by a 6.2 Detroit Diesel engine and a TH400 Automatic transmission. A whole bunch of upgrades have been done to this beast, below are just a few important highlights that come to mind.

51,500 original miles.

Desert Tan paint job.

Raptor lined interior

4" Pro Comp Suspension Lift (Profesionally done @ 4 Wheel Parts about 9 mths ago).

New Pro Comp stabilizer control arm.

New MOOG ball joints and tie rod ends.

All new weather seals (doors/camper/tailgate/etc).

New + balanced drive shaft and U-Joints (professionally done a U-Joints, INC of El Paso).

New Aluminum radiator + water hoses

All New fluids + filters (Motor/Transmission/Transfer case/Differentials).

New windshield

New Gauges (Oil/Volts/Temp).

Equipped with a factory Gov-lock on rear differential


This truck is as tough as a tank and it's in great shape, runs like a champ and has never failed me or left me stranded anywhere.

If you're looking for a reliable cool looking rig that give us a good MPG (18/25 mpg) gets compliments everywhere, then look no further - This is it..

This is well taken care off ex-military vehicle with no complicated electronics, very easy to work with. It has no carpet or non of that comfort nonsense.

Ohh, and did I mentioned it's  DIESEL???


Thanks for looking, feel free to ask any questions.







Auto Services in Texas

Woodway Car Center ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers
Address: 9900 Woodway Dr, Oglesby
Phone: (254) 751-1444

Woods Paint & Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 120 Prince Ln, Royse-City
Phone: (972) 771-1778

Wilson Paint & Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting, Truck Painting & Lettering
Address: 125 N Waco St, Hillsboro
Phone: (254) 582-2212

WHITAKERS Auto Body & Paint ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 2019 S Lamar Blvd, Volente

Westerly Tire & Automotive Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 8101 Camp Bowie West Blvd, Richland-Hills
Phone: (817) 244-5333

VIP Engine Installation ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 8252 Scyene Rd, Combine
Phone: (214) 377-7295

Auto blog

12 new cars that will never go out of style

Tue, Nov 23 2021

Some cars never go out of style. It’s rare, but it happens. They get old. They get depreciated. But they never stop looking cool.  Some might call them modern or instant classics. Within a few years theyÂ’re no longer the latest and greatest, no longer the flavor of the month, but they remain special. Eternally special. Timeless.  These cars arenÂ’t necessarily going to be worth a fortune someday. However, some may not depreciate as rapidly or as far as other models. But thatÂ’s not what weÂ’re talking about here. These are the cars that enthusiasts will always find desirable from the curbside. TheyÂ’re the cars you end up shopping on eBay late at night 10 years later because you canÂ’t get them out of your head. TheyÂ’re the cars that will forever excite you when you spot a clean one in traffic or in a parking lot.  There are plenty of recent examples over the past couple of decades that could count as instant design classics. But then we got to thinking, what 2021 models will be forever cool to stare at? Which new cars and trucks on sale today will we be shopping on eBay late at night in the 2030s? We kept supercars and other ultra-expensive cars off the list to keep things within the realm of attainability, and ended up with 12 total cars. Lexus LC WeÂ’re not applying a numerical ranking to any of the cars on this list, but if we were, the Lexus LC would be No. 1. There isnÂ’t another car design out there that can stir our emotions the way an LC can when itÂ’s just standing still. This car is a concept design come true in the most beautiful of ways, and itÂ’s a shoo-in winner for Concours events decades into the future. All of this heaping praise, and we havenÂ’t even gotten to the LC 500Â’s intoxicating 5.0-liter V8. It doesnÂ’t win drag races. It wonÂ’t be the fastest around the track against any similarly-priced competition. But none of that matters. ItÂ’s quite possibly the best car you can buy new, and that says it all when it comes to the LC. Chevrolet Corvette It might not be the stunner that the Lexus LC is, but the new C8 Corvette is and will always be a special vehicle. ItÂ’s the first mid-engine Corvette, which instantly cements it into an automotive hall of fame section of sorts. All of the performance stats and specs are there to back up its supercar-like looks, and it remains the best performance bargain on sale today.

GM under fire from safety advocates over braking problem caused by recall fix

Thu, Feb 6 2020

Safety experts are lambasting General Motors over what they say is the automaker’s slow notification of owners of certain 2019 sedans and trucks that a recall fix could cause power braking to fail and increase the risk of a crash, the Detroit Free Press reports.  GMÂ’s original recall in December targeted about 550,000 Cadillac CT6 sedans and Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 pickups, all from the 2019 model year, over potentially defective electronic stability control and antilock brakes. In that case, GM said the errors would not show up as a diagnostic warning on the instrument cluster. But after GM had done recall work on 162,000 vehicles, about 1,700 owner have complained that their power brakes didnÂ’t work after they had the recall done and then used the OnStar app to start their vehicle. GM then issued a supplemental fix for customers whoÂ’d already had their vehicles serviced. In this case, a diagnostic warning should illuminate saying either “Service Brake Assist” or “Service ECS,” which GM says is a signal that a customer should not drive the vehicle and instead call their dealer, which will tow the vehicle and have it repaired. Safety advocates say the automaker hasnÂ’t gone far enough to protect customers. “The fact that you could potentially start a vehicle and not have brakes is a pretty risky proposition,” Sean Kane, president of the Safety Research and Strategies, which works on auto issues for plaintiffs and governmental organizations, told the Freep. “The fact that they wouldnÂ’t notify owners (sooner) is pretty stunning.” GM told the Freep it was required to notify the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and file paperwork before it notified customers about the original recall, which was made Dec. 12. It then had to investigate and resolve the problem created by its original recall fix before alerting customers. GMÂ’s call center and dealers are contacting the remaining 900 customers who havenÂ’t yet had the update made to the original recall repair. GM also hired a vendor to send recall letters to the 550,000 customers affected by the original recall notifying them about the update. There are no known injuries or deaths related to the problem. Read the Freep story here.

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.