Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1979 Chevy K5 Blazer 2wd Lowered 6700 Since Restored on 2040-cars

Year:1979 Mileage:6732
Location:

Portland, Oregon, United States

Portland, Oregon, United States
Advertising:

 6700 miles since restoration.  GM crate 350, new 700R4, factory AC, CC, tilt, working factory tach, power windows and locks.  everything works except the interior switch for the rear window.  I am currently trying to find one in town. the carpet and seats are in great shape.  the body and paint are near perfect.  I say near because it get driven.  the top was smoothed and painted to match.  all new trim, rubber seals, dash pad, gauges, bezels, grill, headlights, tail lights, etc.  everything was factory GM.  has a hidden hitch and trailer brakes.  3.73 gears and a 12 bolt posi.  the 700R4 swap was done with factory parts.  lowered front and rear with belltech spindles and shackles.  new true dual exhaust with cats.  torq thrust wheels and almost new 275/60/15 tires all the way around.  there is no rust anywhere and there never has been.  this truck spent almost 15 years in storage after it was painted before it was finished and hit the road.  you will not find another nicer K5 out there that hasn't been cut, bagged, etc.  this is very clean and classy.  it drives like a dream.  you could eat off the under side of it.  if you need more pictures please do not hesitate to call me at 503-519-7290 or email .  this is being sold because we outgrew it and I am going to move up to a suburban instead.  I have the full history on the truck and would be more than happy to talk to anyone about it. 


Auto Services in Oregon

Uncle Al`s Automotive Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 180 E Clarendon St, Canby
Phone: (503) 655-9977

Toyota of Gladstone ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 19375 SE McLoughlin Blvd, Gladstone
Phone: (866) 381-9457

Tommy`s Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 915 SE 12th Ave, Portland
Phone: (503) 963-8468

Three Sisters Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: 177 W Sisters Park Dr, Sisters
Phone: (541) 549-1890

Peoria Electric ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 33901 SE Peoria Rd, Shedd
Phone: (541) 753-9191

Oak Valley Honda ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 8515 Lone Oak Rd N, Lafayette
Phone: (503) 472-0465

Auto blog

General Motors and EVs: No stranger to firsts, but where's the leadership?

Tue, Apr 7 2015

2015 is already shaping up to be the year of "affordable, 200-mile EV" concepts. Nissan and Tesla have each been talking about them for some time, the latter promising to unveil its Model 3 at the North American International Auto Show in January before balking when the time came. Instead, Chevrolet beat them all by unveiling the Bolt concept at the same event, followed shortly thereafter with suggestions of a 2016 launch – potentially offering the first nationwide EV with anything close to that range. It was the ballsiest EV-related move General Motors has made in a quarter century. But will it remain so? Exactly 25 years before the Bolt rolled up onto the turntable, then-Chairman Roger Smith unveiled GM's last ground-up EV concept, the even-more-unfortunately-named Impact, at the Los Angeles Auto Show in January 1990. A few months later, he surprised most of his colleagues by announcing its intended production in honor of Earth Day. It was the first modern foray into electric vehicles for the US by any automaker, one that was rewarded by the State of California with what is now known as the Zero Emissions Vehicle mandate. The program not only forced other automakers into competing with Roger's pet project, but inspired all of them to fight it like small children against bedtime. Some years later, the drivers themselves weighed in, with a biting documentary about that obstinance and the leadership it cost both GM and the country. Within months, GM was first back into the fray of plug-in vehicles. Many criticized the company for starting with a PHEV rather than jump straight back into EVs. The choice wasn't totally out of the blue – even EV1 was meant to be followed by a PHEV. And especially on the heels of Who Killed the Electric Car?, some skittishness was understandable: even a successful EV would invite a "we told you so" public reaction, underscoring their mistake in ending the EV1 program. If a new EV didn't do well, they'd be convicted in the public eye as serial killers. All while seeking a federal bailout. For all the flak, the resulting Chevy Volt was and is a better car than GM has ever gotten credit for. But the company seemed to grow weary of having to overcome its varied past, and while the current owners remain happy, much of the stakeholder and community engagement that so effectively built early goodwill and sales growth faded not long after launch. Marketing has been spotty in both consistency and effectiveness.

IIHS Crash-tests Expose American Muscle Cars' Weaknesses | Autoblog Minute

Thu, Jun 2 2016

Turns out American muscle cars aren?t that strong according to IIHS crash tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put three iconic American sports cars through a range of performance crash tests. Chevrolet Dodge Ford Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video crash test camaro challenger

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.