1972 Chevrolet Blazer Base Sport Utility 2-door 5.7l Cst 4x4 on 2040-cars
Edmonds, Washington, United States
Here is the classic 1972 Blazer CST you have been waiting for. Fresh restore ( less than 2 years old and rarely driven since). AC, TACH, 4x4 Refinished last year in factory original medium bronze metallic paint. West Coast vehicle and stored indoors. Vintage air/heat unit professionally installed. Strong running 350 V8. exact mileage is unknown. Starts, runs, shifts, drives, and stops as it should. New tires. All gauges and lights work as they should, including tach-the dash has not been cut. All glass is good. Rally wheels painted to match. Removable top is in good condition and lift gate functions properly. It is the "double-wall" type top. Any and all rust was professionally removed and treated during restoration. Arrow straight body. I can take pictures of specific areas for interested buyers. Please call me ( 360-340-0143 ) for more info-no disappointments with this one! Restored and kept in very near original condition. I have many, many receipts for the work done. Don't miss out on this one! 360-340-0143 for more info |
Chevrolet Blazer for Sale
- 2002 chevrolet blazer ls sport utility 2-door 4.3l
- 1978 chevrolet blazer (former show truck) must see!!
- 1996 chevy blazer 4wd
- 1996 chevrolet s10 base standard cab pickup 2-door 2.2l
- 1998 chevrolet blazer, new inspection 4x4 - $900, great shape under hood
- Full custom - "blazter" - blazer + roadster. cruiser or show, head turner!
Auto Services in Washington
We Love Transmissions ★★★★★
Triple T Auto Repair ★★★★★
TOS Used Tires and Accessories ★★★★★
Top Performance Auto Inc. ★★★★★
Tc Auto Sales ★★★★★
Sun City Auto Supply ★★★★★
Auto blog
Motor Trend puts Chevy Camaro Z28 and Porsche 911 GT3 Head 2 Head
Mon, Dec 29 2014Motor Trend admits, "This is an unfair comparison." But that doesn't make it any less fun to watch when they pit a Camaro Z/28 against the Porsche 911 GT3. The former has a 7.0-liter V8 with 505 horsepower and 481 pound-feet of torque shifted through a six-speed manual. The latter has a 3.8-liter flat-six with 475 hp and 324 lb-ft shifted through a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. Yet those are only the little disparities – the big disparities are mass and money: the Camaro weighs 3,882 pounds and costs $76,150 as-tested, the Porsche weighs 3,267 pounds and costs $145,785. But they're both about hardcore performance, so MT takes them out on the street, to the drag strip, to the parking lot for figure eights and a skidpad test, and finally to Big Willow for Randy Pobst to give his professional assessment. Remember when a lotta people spent a lotta time debating Pirates vs. Ninjas? This is like that, only it's the "haul-ass good-time car" vs. the "track surgeon." Enjoy the debate in the video.
GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value
Thu, 12 Jun 2014Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.
Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015
Tue, Feb 11 2014Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper. For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011. The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors. While the adoption of SAE J2807 will be helpful for light-duty customers, those interested in bigger trucks will still be left with differing standards. There is no sign of the new tow standards being adopted for the heavy-duty market.