Black '55 on 2040-cars
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:POWERFUL
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Bel Air/150/210
Trim: 210
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: 5 SPEED TREMEC
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 900
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Red
Disability Equipped: No
AMAZING RESTORATION WITH NO COST SPARED. 383 CRATE MOTOR WITH WEIAND SUPERCHARGER, AND DEMON 850 BLOWER-CARB, MSD IGNITION,CCP STEERING AND DISC BRAKES,FATMAN A ARMS IN FRONT AND TRACTION BARS FOR THE REAR. COMPETITION PERFORMANCE CLUTH TO A TREMEC 5 SPEED AND THEN TO A 9 INCH FORD REAR. WHEELS ARE COY WITH 18 INCH FRONTS AND 20 INCH REARS. CLASSIC GAUGES AND VINTAGE AIR. EVERYTHING UNDER THE HOOD IS SPITPOLISHED AND SHINES LIKE A NEW NICKEL. RADIATOR AND SUPPORTS ARE POLISHED TO A PERFECT SHEEN. HAVE A HOME TRADE IN THE WORKS SO WILL SACRIFICE FOR HALF THE RESTORATION COST!!!!!!!480-895-9243 FOR QUESTIONS. IHAVE A VERY LOW RESERVE AND WHEN IT IS MET IT WILL SELL. PLEASE HAVE FUNDS IN HAND. I HAVE ASSISTED BUYERS PREVIOUSLY WITH SHIPPING AND YOU CAN TELL BY MY FEEDBACK THAT EVERYONE THAT DEALS WITH ME HAS BEEN VERY HAPPY. THIS IS A REAL DEAL AND SOMEONE WILL GET A HIGH QUALITY RESTORATION AT A FRACTION OF THE PRICE THAT IT WOULD TAKE TO DO ONE YOURSELF!!!!
On Jan-30-13 at 06:40:59 PST, seller added the following information:
IATTENDED THE 2013 BARRET-JACKSON AUCTION AND LOOKED AT 55 OF THIS CALIBER. AFTER VERY THOROUGH INSPECTION I FOUND THAT MY RESTORATION WAS IN BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF LOT1290 WHICH SOLD FOR 100,100 AND DEFINTELY HIGHER QUALITY THAN LOT 1568 WHICH SOLD FOR 68200. IF YOU ADD BIDDER FEES AND SCOTTSDALE SALES TAX YOU CAN SEE WHAT KIND OF BUY THIS CAR IS. REMEMBER ALSO THAT THERE IS NO SALES TAX ON PRIVATE PARTY AUTOS IN ARIZONA
On Jan-30-13 at 14:02:43 PST, seller added the following information:
this unit is of course for sale locally and could sell before end of auction
Chevrolet Bel Air/150/210 for Sale
350 cid, power steering & brakes, custom build, tubular suspension, am/fm/cd(US $38,995.00)
1955 chevy belair 2drhtp frame off restored big block 4spd(US $39,500.00)
1965 chevy bel air hot street rod muscle car chevrolet 454 monster(US $24,900.00)
1956 chevy belair 4 door v8 two tone green with matching interior - nice driver(US $10,500.00)
Chevrolet bel air
Built 383 stroker, 4-speed muncie, 9-inch rear, twin power buckets, race-ready a(US $36,995.00)
Auto Services in Arizona
Your Automotive Solution ★★★★★
White`s Integrity Auto Ctr ★★★★★
Wheeler Glass Inc ★★★★★
Tucson Independant Muffler Super Car Center ★★★★★
TechPlus Automotive ★★★★★
Super Discount Transmissions ★★★★★
Auto blog
Super Bowl MVP Tom Brady gives Chevy Colorado to Malcolm Butler [w/poll]
Tue, Feb 3 2015Winning the Super Bowl, we'd imagine, is pretty sweet. Winning the MVP award at the Super Bowl, even more so – for many reasons, among them that you get a brand new Chevy Colorado, packed full of, you know... technology and stuff. Of course this year's Most Valuable Player was none other than Tom Brady, the New England Patriots quaterback who was crowned Super Bowl MVP for the third time and lead the Pats to win the Super Bowl for the fourth time. He makes tens of millions every season, and Mrs. Brady (a.k.a. Gisele Bundchen) probably makes an extraordinarily pretty penny herself. So what does one of the most successful and wealthy players in NFL history need with a new pickup truck? Not a whole lot, apparently: the Boston Business Journal reports that he gave the truck to Malcolm Butler, the rookie cornerback who intercepted Seattle Seahawks QB Russell Wilson's pass on the Patriots' one-yard line with only twenty seconds to go and sealed the victory for New England. Which strikes us as a fitting gesture, even if Brady did keep the MVP trophy for himself. Related Video: Related Gallery 2015 Chevrolet Colorado View 31 Photos News Source: Chevrolet, Boston Business JournalImage Credit: Jamie Squire/Getty Celebrities Chevrolet Truck tom brady new england patriots
IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving
Tue, Oct 11 2022WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.