1957 Chevrolet Bel Air 150210 on 2040-cars
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
More details at: kacikbbirnell@seeksfun.com .
This '57 Chevy was completely restored over a four year period and was the product of an off the frame
restoration, by the previous owner, paying great attention to detail, not cutting corners due to cost, and a lot
of TLC. As you can see, it sports a lot of Bel-Air chrome and is a real show stopper. Whether for cruisin' or for
show, this beauty will definitely turn heads.
DETAILS:
- 1957 Chevy 2-Door Hardtop w/Post
- Approx. 14,000 miles since restoration
- 350 Chevrolet Engine
- 350 Turbo Transmission
- Erson Cam
- Edelbrock Intake
- Chrome Chevrolet Valve Covers
- Four Barrel Chrome Carburetor - Carter AFB 650 (Completely Rebuilt June 2015)
- New Fuel Pump June 2015
- Center Dump Manifolds
- HEI Distributor
- Chrome Alternator
- Aluminum High Efficiency Radiator
- Shock Mounting Bar
- Stock Rear End
- Front Disc Brakes, Rear Drum
- Turbo Dual Exhaust Mufflers w/Chrome Tips (Sounds Great)
- New Wiring Throughout at Time of Restoration
- Electric Wiper Motor
- New Glass at Time of Restoration, Except for Rear Window
- Bumpers re-chromed
- 15" Chrome Wheels w/ Daytona Tires
- New Battery May 2016
- Solid Trunk with Full Coverage Mat, Full Size Spare, and Jack
- GM Paint - Medium Garnet Base w/ Clear Coat
- Custom Interior
- Red Cloth Bench Seats, Headliner, Sun Visors and Door Panels w/Vinyl Kick Panels
- Red Carpet
- Custom Floor Mats
- Roses Etched in Wing Vents
- This vehicle is a smoke free vehicle (No one has smoked in this vehicle).
- Runs and Drives Very Well! Fantastic Cruiser! SORRY NO TRADES!!!
Chevrolet Bel Air/150/210 for Sale
- Chevrolet: bel air/150/210 convertible; 2 door(US $49,000.00)
- 1957 chevrolet bel air/150/210 convertible duck pearl (rose) metallic(US $25,900.00)
- Chevrolet: bel air/150/210 150(US $8,100.00)
- 1955 chevrolet bel air/150/210(US $16,510.00)
- 1957 chevrolet bel air/150/210 convertible- rare color - 7k miles(US $25,900.00)
- Chevrolet: bel air/150/210 210 townsman 6 pass wag(US $17,000.00)
Auto Services in Maryland
The Body Works of VA INC ★★★★★
Sarandos Automotive Technology Inc ★★★★★
Safety First Auto Repair ★★★★★
Quick Lane ★★★★★
Prestige Automotive ★★★★★
Preferred Automotive Assoc ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM to idle car production at five factories as Americans continue CUV love affair
Mon, Dec 19 2016In case you needed another reminder that Americans have fallen out of love with sedans, General Motors today announced plans to idle five factories in January in a bid to cut its inventory to 70 days. Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly ( Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Chevrolet Volt and Impala) and Fairfax Assembly in Kansas ( Chevy Malibu) will stop production for three weeks. Lansing Grand River ( Cadillac ATS and CTS, and Chevy Camaro) is going down for two weeks, while Lordstown, OH ( Chevy Cruze) and Bowling Green, KY ( Chevy Corvette) will go idle for a week each, Automotive News reports. GM's shutdown reflects a broader problem with the company's supply – at 847,000 vehicles, the company's supply increased unsteadily from a low of 629,000 units in January of 2016. That's more than a 25 percent increase in the past year. Citing information from Autodata, The Detroit News reports that at the end of November, GM had a 168-day supply of LaCrosses, 177 days' worth of Camaro, 170 days of Corvette, 121 days for Cruze, 119 days for ATS, 132 days for CTS, and 110 days of CT6. Meanwhile, inventory of the company's more popular vehicles is actually below the professionally accepted 60- to 70-day supply, The News reports. The Trax, Colorado pickup, and GM's full-size SUVs are sitting below 50 days and experiencing year-over-year sales increases. GM needs a rethink of its inventory levels, which is something that's apparently coming. "We're going to be responsible in managing our inventory levels," GM spokesman Jim Cain told The News. Another unnamed spokesman told Automotive News the company's day-to-day supplies would "fluctuate before moderating at year-end." But at least one analyst thinks this won't be the last time Detroit needs to stop production to level things out. "Incentives are elevated, residuals are declining, and rates are rising," Brian Johnson, an analyst with Barclays, told The News. "And while GM in particular may benefit in the months ahead from new product launches, it's important to recognize that GM's inventory is elevated at the moment, and it wouldn't surprise us if they need to announce another production cut – which could pressure the stock." Related Video: News Source: The Detroit News, Automotive News - sub. req.Image Credit: Paul Sancya / AP Plants/Manufacturing Buick Cadillac Chevrolet GM GMC Crossover SUV Sedan bowling green cadillac xt6 fairfax
Here are a few of our automotive guilty pleasures
Tue, Jun 23 2020It goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway. The world is full of cars, and just about as many of them are bad as are good. It's pretty easy to pick which fall into each category after giving them a thorough walkaround and, more important, driving them. But every once in a while, an automobile straddles the line somehow between good and bad — it may be hideously overpriced and therefore a marketplace failure, it may be stupid quick in a straight line but handles like a drunken noodle, or it may have an interior that looks like it was made of a mess of injection-molded Legos. Heck, maybe all three. Yet there's something special about some bad cars that actually makes them likable. The idea for this list came to me while I was browsing classified ads for cars within a few hundred miles of my house. I ran across a few oddballs and shared them with the rest of the team in our online chat room. It turns out several of us have a few automotive guilty pleasures that we're willing to admit to. We'll call a few of 'em out here. Feel free to share some of your own in the comments below. Dodge Neon SRT4 and Caliber SRT4: The Neon was a passably good and plucky little city car when it debuted for the 1995 model year. The Caliber, which replaced the aging Neon and sought to replace its friendly marketing campaign with something more sinister, was panned from the very outset for its cheap interior furnishings, but at least offered some decent utility with its hatchback shape. What the two little front-wheel-drive Dodge models have in common are their rip-roarin' SRT variants, each powered by turbocharged 2.4-liter four-cylinder engines. Known for their propensity to light up their front tires under hard acceleration, the duo were legitimately quick and fun to drive with a fantastic turbo whoosh that called to mind the early days of turbo technology. — Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski Chevrolet HHR SS: Chevy's HHR SS came out early in my automotive journalism career, and I have fond memories of the press launch (and having dinner with Bob Lutz) that included plenty of tire-smoking hard launches and demonstrations of the manual transmission's no-lift shift feature. The 260-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder was and still is a spunky little engine that makes the retro-inspired HHR a fun little hot rod that works quite well as a fun little daily driver.
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.