Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2010 Avalanche Ltz, 2wd, Nav, Loaded, Rear Cam, Remote Start, Low Miles 32k on 2040-cars

Year:2010 Mileage:32000
Location:

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Springfield, Missouri, United States

2010 Avalanche LTZ 2wd, Navigation, Loaded,  White Diamond Tricoat, with Black interior - CLEAN CAR FAX NO ACCIDENTS- CLEAN AUTO CHECK with a score of 94 (click on link to see full report) Loaded, Leather Seats, Heated and Cooled Seats, Bluetooth, Remote Start, Rear Backup Camera, OnStar, Flex Fuel. Always Garaged.  Best color combo. Very Low miles 32,000 still smells new. If you are looking for a very low miles Loaded Avalanche - you will not be disappointed. Priced right.

Chevrolet Avalanche for Sale

Auto Services in Missouri

West 60 Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 301 W Glenwood St, Fordland
Phone: (417) 889-2886

Wes Jerde Performance Center ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Auto Racing
Address: 11320 Hickman Mills Dr, Lake-Winnebago
Phone: (816) 461-4017

Waterloo Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 622 N Market St, Sulphur-Springs
Phone: (618) 937-8438

The Dent Devil of St Louis ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 14949 Manchester Road, Twin-Oaks
Phone: (636) 230-7900

Springfield Yamaha ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Motorcycle Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 5183 E Kearney St, Willard
Phone: (417) 862-4343

Spectrum Glass Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windows
Address: Richwoods
Phone: (636) 614-0267

Auto blog

Nissan Leaf sets another monthly sales record, Chevy Volt remains steady

Mon, Nov 3 2014

Here we go again. Another month in the books and another month of record sales by the Nissan Leaf in the US. For October, the world's best-selling pure EV sold 2,589 units, which is 29.3 percent more than October 2013. That makes it 20 times in a row that Nissan can say that last month sales were better than the same month a year before. All told, Nissan has sold 24,411 Leafs in the US this year, a new record, reflecting an overall Leaf sales rate that is up 35 percent, year-to-date. Nissan isn't stopping, either. A new TV ad, one that, "encourages consumers to kick gas" by saving money on fuel will start airing today in major markets, according to Toby Perry, director of Nissan's EV marketing. You can watch it below. As for the Chevy Volt, things remained steady last month in the face of a new model that's coming in the second half of 2015. Chevy sold 1,439 Volts last month, which is about the same as September (1,394) but down 28.8 percent from the October 2013 despite GM having its best overall US October sales this year since 2007. So far, 2014 Volt year-to-date sales are down 14.9 percent through the end of October compared to 2013. And that wraps up the flash report on monthly sales for these two long-standing plug-in vehicles in the US market. As always, we'll have our in-depth write-up of US green car sales available soon. For now, we await your comments, below. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd

GM's MPG overstatement could affect 2 million vehicles

Tue, May 17 2016

Late last week, GM admitted that three of its large SUVs fuel economy window stickers did not match their actual efficiency ratings, and so the vehicles couldn't be sold. The stickers on the 2016 Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Buick Enclave said their ratings were one to two miles per gallon better than they should have been. Officially, the number of affected vehicles sits at about 60,000. But Consumer Reports makes a good point: what's up with all of the previous model year SUVs that are basically the same vehicle? To wit: the 2016 model year vehicles are not substantially different than the 2015 or the 2014, or even going all the way back to 2007. On the EPA's fuel economy website, all of these older models will "have better stated fuel economy numbers than the new vehicles in GM's dealerships," Consumer Reports noted. CR's best point, and the one that makes the 60,000 number potentially grow to 2 million if all of the vehicles built on this platform are affected, is that "[i]t seems unlikely that the company would change the powertrain on these carryover models so late in their model cycles in a way that would cause a dramatic, negative impact on fuel economy." GM says that earlier model year SUVs are not affected and the EPA did not respond to CR's question about the potential for more discrepancies. We've seen automakers reverse course before, so if GM has to come out with a mea culpa soon, don't be surprised. GM is rushing corrected stickers to dealers so that the SUVs can be sold again, but a fix for the already-sold vehicles could be trickier to solve. Related Video: Related Gallery 2013 GMC Acadia View 16 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Buick Chevrolet GMC Fuel Efficiency mpg gmc acadia chevy traverse