2005 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 Z71 on 2040-cars
839 W Terra Ln, O'Fallon, Missouri, United States
Engine:5.3L V8 16V MPFI OHV Flexible Fuel
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3GNEK12Z35G280766
Stock Num: 3887
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Avalanche 1500 Z71
Year: 2005
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 95722
5.3L, V8, 4WD, POWER WINDOWS, LOCKS, MIRRORS, SEATS, DUAL CLIMATE CONTROL, TOW PACKAGE, STEERING WHEEL MOUNTED CONTROLS, BLUETOOTH, ADJUSTABLE PEDALS, TINTED GLASS, CHROME WHEELS. COMES WITH MO SAFETY & EMISSIONS INSPECTONS, 30 DAY WARRANTY, 30 DAY TEMP TAG. CALL OUR FRIENDLY STAFF 888-595-7189. Mylenbusch Auto Source, in O'Fallon, MO, is proud to serve customers throughout the St. Louis area. It is our goal to be the dealer of choice for customers who call O'Fallon 'home'. Mylenbusch Auto Source is conveniently located just minutes from I-70. We look forward to taking care of all of your needs for your vehicle purchase.
Chevrolet Avalanche for Sale
- 2012 chevrolet avalanche 1500 ls(US $27,900.00)
- 2012 chevrolet avalanche lt(US $39,990.00)
- 2007 chevrolet avalanche lt(US $18,850.00)
- 2003 chevrolet avalanche 1500 z71(US $12,995.00)
- 2008 chevrolet avalanche lt(US $16,977.00)
- 2006 chevrolet avalanche(US $13,777.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
West 60 Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Wes Jerde Performance Center ★★★★★
Waterloo Automotive ★★★★★
The Dent Devil of St Louis ★★★★★
Springfield Yamaha ★★★★★
Spectrum Glass Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM reintroduces Tripower name in the worst way possible
Wed, Aug 1 2018The story of General Motors' use of the Tripower moniker begins way back in 1957, when Semon E. "Bunkie" Knudsen, then General Manager of GM's Pontiac division, directed his engineers to inject more performance into his brand's line of V8-powered automobiles. Fuel injection was an option, but hot rodders flocked instead to Tri-Power (marketed way back when with a hyphen), which grafted a trio of two-barrel Rochester carburetors onto a single intake manifold. A legend was born. And that legend was born of performance. At idle and when full power wasn't required, Pontiac's Tri-Power system used just the middle carburetor, which helped make the setup easier to tune. Depending on the year and model, either a vacuum system or a mechanical linkage opened up the two outer carbs, thereby switching from two barrels to six, and allowing the engine to take in more fuel and air. And it was an easy marketing win – six barrels is better than four barrels, right? Because performance! So, when news filtered in that GM has resurrected the Tripower name, those of us who grew up attending classic car shows and wrenching on old Pontiacs did a double-take. And then we all collectively sighed. Turns out that today's Tripower refers to a trio of fuel-saving measures that include cylinder deactivation, active thermal management, and intake valve lift control, according to Automotive News. And, at least for now, it applies to GM's line of fullsize trucks powered by a 2.7-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine. We're all for saving fuel whenever possible. And we have zero say in how any automaker chooses to market its products and technologies. But, we'll offer our two cents anyway: Relaunching a storied name from the past is fine. Relaunching a storied name from the past while completely overlooking the reasons the name got famous in the first place is only going to irritate the people who remember the name in the first place. Couldn't they just call this new technology package something else? Related Video: News Source: Automotive NewsImage Credit: Getty Green Marketing/Advertising Chevrolet GM Pontiac Automotive History Truck chevrolet silverado
Personal testimonies show real-world effect of plugging in with Chevy Volt
Mon, Jan 13 2014At this point, there are tens of thousands of individual stories about what it's like to live with a Chevrolet Volt. But it also remains informative to take a look at one of these in depth. For example, one Atlanta-area Volt owner says he's cut his cents-per-mile ownership costs by almost 40 percent compared to his previous car primarily because of his ability to drive almost all the time on electric power. Jeffrey Cohen told Clean Technica that he put about 14,000 miles on his Volt extended-range plug-in hybrid for the year that ended October 2013, and that more than 92 percent of those were on electrons. He estimates his "lifetime" miles per gallon rating at a whopping 384 mpg, a figure pushed upward by the fact that he installed a Level 2 charger at home while his employer added an external 110-volt charger at work. Cohen is spending 45 cents a mile for his car, compared to 73 cents in his Infiniti M35. As a result, he's spending 45 cents a mile for his car, compared to 73 cents a mile with his prior vehicle, an Infiniti M35. About two-thirds of those Volt costs are for the $349-a-month lease payments, while 15 percent is insurance, 11 percent is for the charger and seven percent for the gas and electricity that actually powers the car. Helping lower that last figure is an overnight electricity rate that's about 10 percent of Cohen's daytime rate. Chevy parent General Motors hopes such testimonies will re-trigger sales for the Volt in 2014. Last year, GM sold 23,094 Volts, down 1.6 percent from 2012. We expect our readers have similar stories they'd like to share in the Comments. Related Gallery 2011 Chevrolet Volt: Review View 22 Photos News Source: Clean TechnicaImage Credit: Lead image: AP Photo/Jae C. Hong Green Chevrolet GM Electric running costs
Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme
Mon, 17 Dec 2012They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.