Van Wheelchair Handicap Chevrolet Astro 2005 Side Entry Ricon Power Ramp on 2040-cars
Neptune, New Jersey, United States
Body Type:Minivan, Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Used
Year: 2005
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Astro
Trim: 4.3
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: 4.4
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 42,300
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: WHEELCHAIR VAN ASTRO 2005 EZYLOCK
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gold
Disability Equipped: Yes
CHEVROLET ASTRO 2005 WITH EZY LOCK
Up for auction is a 2005 Chevrolet Astro with ezy lock Handicap Van with a Power side door, power ramp. The van has the 3" lowered floor, rear bench seat, gold cloth seating, power windows, power door locks, power heated mirrors, A/C front and rear, dual front airbags, CD player, tilt and cruise control. It has the spots mounted in floor to tie down a wheelchair. The van runs and drives excellent. It has the 4.3L V6 engine with an automatic transmission. The wheelchair ramp and door work perfect.
Winning bidder must contact us within 24 hours of
auction end, and make arrangements for payment at that time. A $500.00 non-refundable
deposit is due within 24 hours of end of auction. The remainder is due within 3
days of auction end. If no contact is made within 24 hours we reserve the right
to re-list the vehicle, sell it to the next high bidder, or sell it otherwise.
We have been a licensed Automobile Dealership in New Jersey. We are primarily an Auto Wholesale Operation supplying other dealerships, and we are now listing select vehicles for sale to the public as well. I am the internet/wholesale manager and my name is Jean. Please feel free to call me with any questions at 732 895 3081. The auction fee in the amount of $199.00 will be added to the total winning bid to cover buyer's expenses in picking-up the vehicle. The fee is not negotiable and includes: car detailing, paperwork, notary, title transfer, messenger. |
Chevrolet Astro for Sale
- 1996 chevy astro van(US $800.00)
- 1998 chevrolet astro ls standard passenger van 3-door 4.3l(US $1,000.00)
- 2005 chevrolet astro passenger van(US $9,780.00)
- 2003 astro cargo van all wheel drive(US $4,995.00)
- Pro street, hot rod, van, micky thompson, sbc, v8
- 1996 chevrolet astro van california special with rear air all power 99000 miles
Auto Services in New Jersey
World Class Collision ★★★★★
Warren Wylie & Sons ★★★★★
W & W Auto Body ★★★★★
Union Volkswagen ★★★★★
T`s & Son Auto Repair ★★★★★
South Shore Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Motor Trend puts Chevy Camaro Z28 and Porsche 911 GT3 Head 2 Head
Mon, Dec 29 2014Motor Trend admits, "This is an unfair comparison." But that doesn't make it any less fun to watch when they pit a Camaro Z/28 against the Porsche 911 GT3. The former has a 7.0-liter V8 with 505 horsepower and 481 pound-feet of torque shifted through a six-speed manual. The latter has a 3.8-liter flat-six with 475 hp and 324 lb-ft shifted through a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. Yet those are only the little disparities – the big disparities are mass and money: the Camaro weighs 3,882 pounds and costs $76,150 as-tested, the Porsche weighs 3,267 pounds and costs $145,785. But they're both about hardcore performance, so MT takes them out on the street, to the drag strip, to the parking lot for figure eights and a skidpad test, and finally to Big Willow for Randy Pobst to give his professional assessment. Remember when a lotta people spent a lotta time debating Pirates vs. Ninjas? This is like that, only it's the "haul-ass good-time car" vs. the "track surgeon." Enjoy the debate in the video.
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.
Next Chevy Silverado could get this built-in tailgate step
Thu, Feb 2 2017General Motors just received patent approval for a tailgate step in a pickup bed. And given the timing, don't be surprised if you see this on the upcoming 2019 Silverado pickup (not the mention its GMC Sierra twin), expected to arrive in late 2018. According to the patent, granted in December of last year, the whole mechanism is housed in the tailgate assemble. The magic happens when a portion of the top half of the tailgate swings down and a step folds out. There's also a handle that locks into position to help climb up into the bed. As trucks get bigger and taller over the years, it gets harder and harder to access the cargo bed. Ford's solution with the 2009 F-150 was a step that slides out from the end of the tailgate. Back then, Chevy made an ill-advised ad highlighting the feature for Ford. And while Howie Long mocked the F-150's "man step" Ford saw almost a third of its trucks with the option in the first year. The GM design seems to improve on Ford's idea as it appears to be wider and has a back to the lower step. That is, you don't have to worry about stepping through the ladder-rung design as on the F-150. Ford's tailgate step later spread to the F Super Duty, and other cargo access assists have proliferated through the truck world. On the most recent redesign, the Chevrolet Silverado took a trick from the Avalanche and added cutouts to the corners of the rear bumper that act as a foothold. Ford also offers a deployable side step, Chevrolet has running boards that scoot rearward with a kick of the boot, and Ram offers fixed wheel-to-wheel side rails. Nissan is in on the game too, with an optional folding step that tucks under the rear bumper. We don't expect Chevrolet to comment on when or if we'll see this feature in the showrooms. But given that engineers are already hard at work on the next Silverado and the timing of this patent lines right up with the new truck's development cycle, we'll be disappointed if this patent stays in the file cabinet. Related Video:
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.038 s, 7807 u