2004 Cadillac Xlr Hardtop Convertible. Drop Dead Gorgeous. 36,000 Miles. on 2040-cars
Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania, United States
Body Type:Hardtop convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Cadillac
Model: XLR
Trim: Base Convertible 2-Door
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 36,345
Exterior Color: Crimson Pearl
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
2004 drop dead gorgeous Cadillac XLR. Spotless. Absolutely beautiful. Comes with all options as standard equipment. These cars were only manufactured from 2004 to 2009. I believe there were only about 15,000 of them made in total. Quite a few were available in 2012 because some of the 2009's were coming in from the 39 month leases. Many people kept theirs because they are an awesome vehile and the leasees just decided to keep them. About a year before the XLR's were produced Cadillac introduced it as a concept car and called it the EVOC. It was so futuristic in its design and so well accepted that they decided to produce it. They were around $85,000 new. I understand that many of the XLR's actually went to Europe. Prior to finding this one, I had only seen two of them. One in Boston, MA and the other in Delray Beach, FL. They are quite a head turner. It draws a crowd where ever I park it. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this car. Why am I selling it ?? Because I loved this one so much that I bought another one. ALL of my cars are black. I found the XLR to be a keeper but not in red. I bought an '06 in black. Exactly the same car only a different color. The crimson pearl is actually much more beautiful than the black. Now I'm not saying the black one is beautiful but just not a gorgeous as the red. This car was made to be red. It's the only color that does it the justice due. This XLR is spotless. It runs great and drives great. I just ran it through state inspection on April 10, 2013. It needed windshield wipers. Probably because they were dried out. The car was garage kept and didn't go out in the rain or snow. I have it priced very reasonably because the black one I bought has a flood damage title and I bought it right. It's a great car and since I'm going to keep the car the title doesen't matter to me but it matters to you because all I need for the red XLR is enough money to replace the money I took out of my checking account to buy the black one. BTW, I have had new Corvettes since 2001 and some very nice ones. I sold an '07 ZO6 to but the XLR. My wife doesn't drive my cars but she likes the XLR better than any Corvette I have ever had. The XLR is a "Gentleman's Corvette". This car is worth every penny of the "buy it now" price. Happy bidding and good luck. Any questions call George at 724 544-0221.
Cadillac XLR for Sale
2006 cadillac xlr base convertible 2-door 4.6l(US $30,000.00)
2006 cadillac xlr convertible damaged wrecked rebuildable salvage low reserve 06(US $16,900.00)
Red tan leather interior convertible hud head-up display bose premium sound nav
2005 cadillac xlr convertible 2-door 4.6l no reserve
2004 cadillac xlr(US $21,500.00)
2007 cadillac xlr v silver/black... pristine!(US $42,888.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Wayne Carl Garage ★★★★★
Union Fuel Co ★★★★★
Tint It Is Incorporated ★★★★★
Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Syrena International Ltd ★★★★★
Auto blog
MIT puts V2V technology on its 2015 Top Ten list
Thu, Mar 5 2015Of all the technologies swimming around the automotive world, it is vehicle-to-vehicle communication that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has fished out as one of its Ten Breakthrough Technologies of 2015. It joined emerging tech like brain organoids, supercharged photosynthesis, and Project Loon on the list, and got the nod over autonomous driving because, as the MIT Technology Review wrote, V2V communication "is likely to have a far bigger and more immediate effect on road safety." How so? Because actual cars transmitting data like their location, speed, steering angle, and state of braking to one another at least ten times per second provides a greater degree of awareness than sensor readings and algorithms. The US Department of Transportation and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have been working for years on standards and a regulatory schedule for introducing V2V to the marketplace, and Cadillac plans to incorporate V2V into at least one of its vehicles by 2017. Since we've begun the year with a number of stories of cars being hacked into, that got us wondering about the security of V2V communications. In a recent piece by our own Pete Bigelow on what motorists should know about getting their cars hacked into, he wrote that although cyber break-ins are extremely difficult, expensive, and time-consuming to do remotely, V2V is "one more conceivable avenue a hacker could use to impact multiple cars at a given time." So we spoke to Wilmington, Massachusetts-based Security Innovation about it. The automotive consultancy company has been working with the DOT since 2003 on V2V technology and the issues around it - namely security and privacy - and its chief scientist, William Whyte, is the technical editor of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1609.2 standard outlining its security protocols. Those protocols are expected to be finalized by the DOT toward the end of this year and then come into effect in 2016, and the company's Aerolink product is the security solution Cadillac will use. Whyte said, "If you hack into a car, V2V is the hardest place to start," and Pete Samson, the general manager of Security Innovation's automotive team, said "There are ten or 12 alternate attack surfaces" around the car that would make much easier targets.
GM admits Cadillac ELR no real competition for Tesla Model S
Fri, Aug 15 2014Last year, then-CEO of General Motors, Dan Akerson, made it clear that the company lookouts at the Ren Cen had California automaker Tesla in their sights. "If you want to compete head-to-head with Tesla, and we ultimately will, you want to do it with a Cadillac," he said. So, given the fact that the Cadillac ELR has a plug and sells for roughly the same price at the Tesla Model S ($75,000 vs $69,900, before incentives) and that Cadillac doesn't have any other electric vehicle on the horizon, you'd be forgiven if you thought that the way that Akerson wanted to challenge Tesla's EV success was with the ELR. Well, you'd apparently be wrong. "The ELR is a different car, it's a different price point. It's way-different technology." - GM's Mark Reuss Speaking yesterday in Detroit, GM's head of global product development, Mark Reuss, admitted that the ELR is not the Tesla competitor that Akerson promised. "People like to say the ELR is [competition for the Model S], but it's really not. It's a different car, it's a different price point. It's way-different technology." So, if we follow that logic to conclusion with Akerson's quote from last year, then the only way that Cadillac can eventually compete with Tesla is with a pure electric car, and that seems an outside chance, at best, for the foreseeable future. Through the end of July, Cadillac has sold 578 ELRs since it went on sale earlier this year. Tesla doesn't break out monthly US sales, but has sold 15,114 Model S EVs around the world in the first six months of 2014. For his part, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has already said that GM is headed down the wrong path with plug-in hybrids like the ELR or the Chevy Volt. Speaking about the Volt last year, Musk said, Chevy "sort of created something that's a bit of amphibian," which resulted in a car that's, "Okay but not great."
Mystery shoppers love Infiniti, hate Tesla
Tue, Jul 12 2016Infiniti, followed by Lexus tied with Mercedes-Benz took the top two spots for best sales experience according to mystery shoppers from the latest Pied Piper Prospect Satisfaction Index, while EV manufacturer Tesla recorded the lowest overall score. Not surprisingly, premium brands dominated the top ranks. Including the three already mentioned, luxury brands occupied seven of the top ten spots and included Audi, BMW, Porsche, and the only American brand to crack the upper echelon, Cadillac. Toyota, Volkswagen, and Nissan rounded out the first ten positions. The news for domestic automakers isn't good. Aside from Caddy, the only other star-spangled automaker to score above the industry average is Chrysler. The rest of FCA, most of GM, and all of Ford fell below the line. But Pied Piper's mystery shoppers handed Tesla the biggest walloping – the company is ten full points below the next lowest brand, Volvo, and its score of 86 is 17 below the average of 103. It's baffling, considering the company's touted direct-sales model. "Tesla leaves me scratching my head," Fred O'Hagan, Pied Piper's president and CEO, told Wards Auto. "They own all of their stores, so you would think each one would be doing the same thing. But they're not. Tesla is consistent in its inconsistencies." O'Hagan added that there's a "huge variation" in Tesla's store-to-store effectiveness, and that in some cases, shoppers found showroom workers that acted more like "museum curators," Wards Auto reports. It might be popular to call Tesla the Apple of the car world, but based on Pied Piper's work, the brand has a long way to go to emulate the uniform shopping experience of an Apple Store. The news might be bad for Tesla, but even for the brands that scored below average, there's cause for celebration. Only Tesla and Mini lost points in this year's rankings, and only Mercedes and Lincoln held steady. Every other brand, including Infiniti, which topped the index for the first time, gained at least one point. The biggest improvements belong to Porsche, Land Rover, and Mitsubishi, which all jumped five points. Pied Piper's annual Prospect Satisfaction Index uses mystery shoppers – over 6,100 this year – from across the country to assess dealers and generate rankings from over 50 individual factors. News Source: Pied Piper via WardsAuto Green Audi BMW Cadillac Chrysler Infiniti Lexus Mercedes-Benz Nissan Tesla Toyota Car Buying Car Dealers study




















