Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Nice! 2004 Cadillac Cts-v V8 6spd Manual Loaded Low Miles! @ Best Offer! on 2040-cars

US $12,995.00
Year:2004 Mileage:83505
Location:

Lowell, Massachusetts, United States

Lowell, Massachusetts, United States

VERY CLEAN 2004 CADILLAC CTS-V V8 06 SPEED MANUAL FULL LOADED WITH ONLY 83,505 ORIGINAL MILES


IT RUNS DRIVES AND LOOKS GREAT!!


ONLY $12,995 OR BEST OFFER! WITH FREE SHIPPING AT BUY IT NOW PRICE!


EXTERIOR IS IN GOOD CONDITION!( normal scratches for the year )

INTERIOR IS VERY CLEAN!


THE 5.7L V8 ENGINE RUNS GREAT! ( NO LEAKS OR NOISES! ) AND THE 06 SPEED MANUAL TRANSMISSION SHIFTS SMOOTH IN ALL GEARS!


LOADED WITH: BOSE SOUND,Xenon Headlights,Navigation System,Onstar,18" Alloy Wheels,Steering Wheel Controls,Power Seats/Windows/Locks/Mirros,Leather Interior,Heated Seats,KeyLess Entry,Cruise Control,A/C,Cd Player,ABS Brakes and Much More!!



FOR MORE INFO PLEASE CALL (978761 5164

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Worldwide Preowned ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 185 Liberty St, Duxbury
Phone: (781) 335-0048

Vanderveer Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 930 Washington St, Uphams-Corner
Phone: (781) 255-0797

Swanson Buick-GMC Truck ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 12 Sudbury Rd, Ayer
Phone: (978) 897-3311

Superior Systems ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Alarms & Security Systems, Automobile Accessories
Address: 82 Margin St, Wenham
Phone: (978) 531-1515

Sully`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 16 Mansfield St, Swampscott
Phone: (978) 283-3829

Standard Auto Wrecking ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: 257 Granite St, Sherborn
Phone: (508) 762-4341

Auto blog

2015 Cadillac Escalade configurator lets you bling it your way

Fri, 21 Mar 2014

It's Friday, so there must be a new configurator to play with. While last week we showed you how to build your own McLaren 650S, today's ride is a bit more common. It's the 2015 Cadillac Escalade, a vehicle that you've been able to colorize since the end of last year, and which is sure to be an increasingly common sight on US roads in the coming months.
For those that have played with the build-your-Caddy tool, there's not much new here, aside from the vehicle being configured. The Escalade is available in three trims and two wheelbases, with prices spanning from the SWB, two-wheel-drive Standard, which starts at $72,690, on to the all-wheel-drive, long-wheelbase ESV Premium, which kicks off at $86,790. The options list, meanwhile, isn't hugely extensive. A rear-seat entertainment system and power-retractable side-steps (only available on the Premium trim) are the two notable options, while customers will have their choice of six exterior paints and two to three interior schemes, depending on the trim level.
Hop on over to Cadillac's consumer page and take a look.

Best and Worst GM Cars

Thu, Apr 7 2022

Oh yes, because we just love receiving angry letters from devoted Pontiac Grand Am enthusiasts, we have decided to go there. Based on a heated group Slack conversation, the topic came up about the best and worst GM cars. First of all time, and then those currently on sale, and then just mostly a rambling discussion of Oldsmobiles our parents and grandparents owned (or engineered). Eventually, three of us made the video above. Like it? Maybe we can make more. Many awesome GM cars are definitely going unmentioned here, so please let us know your bests and worsts in the comments below. Mostly, it's important to note that this post largely exists as a vehicle for delivering the above video that dives far deeper into GM's greatest hits and biggest flops, specifically those from the 1980s and 1990s. What you'll find below is a collection of our editors identifying a best current and best-of-all-time choice, plus a worst current and worst-of-all-time choice. Comprehensive it is not, but again, comments. -Senior Editor James Riswick Best Current GM Vehicle Chevrolet Corvette We were flying by the seats of our pants a bit in this first outing and my notes were similarly extemporaneous. When it came time to tie it all together on camera, I failed spectacularly. Thank the maker for text, because this gives me the opportunity to perhaps slightly better explain my convoluted reasoning. I chose the C8 Corvette because it's simply overwhelmingly good, and it's merely the baseline from which this generation of Corvette will be expanded.  While the Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing (more on that in a minute) is an amazing snapshot of GM's current performance standing and its little sibling so enraptured me that I went out and bought one, their existence is fleeting. Corvette will live on; forced-induction Cadillac sport sedans, not so much. So while all three are amazing machines when viewed in a vacuum, the Corvette stands above them as both a reflection of GM's current performance credentials and a signpost of what is to come. So, given the choice between the C8 and the 5V-Blackwing right now, I'd choose the C8. In 10 years, when the Blackwing is no longer in production and Corvette is in its 9th generation? Well, that might be a different story. Now, just pretend I said something even remotely that coherent when we get to the part of the video where I try to make an argument for the 5-V Blackwing as best GM car I've ever driven. Or just laugh at me while I ramble incoherently.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.