No Reserve All Power Parktronic Panoramic Sunroof Sport Pkg Steps 3rd Row Seats on 2040-cars
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Engine:4.8L 4837CC V8 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
Transmission:Automatic
Warranty: Unspecified
Make: BMW
Model: X5
Options: Sunroof
Trim: 4.8i Sport Utility 4-Door
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes
Power Options: Power Windows
Drive Type: AWD
Mileage: 76,800
Vehicle Inspection: Inspected (include details in your description)
Sub Model: AWD 4dr 4.8i
Exterior Color: Silver
Number of Cylinders: 8
Interior Color: Black
BMW X5 for Sale
You will love this one
2009 bmw xdrive 35d diesel all wheel drive suv 100k certified warranty(US $38,989.00)
2004 bmw x5; runs and looks great! low reserve!
2010 bmw x5 awd 4dr 30i(US $35,994.00)
2010 bmw x5 m awd 4dr
2005 bmw x5 4.4l sport/premium/navigation/panorama roof cold weather package(US $14,995.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
X-Cel Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★
Wynne`s Express Lube & Auto ★★★★★
Westwood Tire and Automotive Inc. ★★★★★
Waynes Truck & Auto Service ★★★★★
Triple Nickel Auto Parts ★★★★★
Top Gun Auto Painting & Bdywrk ★★★★★
Auto blog
Mazda3 versus BMW 1 Series and Audi A3 in Euro diesel showdown
Sun, Dec 21 2014It's not exactly a Tesla Model S taking on a Ferrari, but for us green enthusiasts, a drag race and comparison between reasonably priced diesel hatchbacks does hold interest, and UK's Auto Express was kind enough to do the deed. When raced, the diesels actually laid a little rubber coming off the line, though the track was covered in rain. Did we mention it was in the UK? The comparison was between diesel hatchbacks priced at less than 22,000 British pounds (about $34,500 US), and Auto Express pitted a Mazda3, a BMW 1-Series and an Audi A3 against each other. The results are revealed in the 11-minute video you can watch below. In short, one car smoked the others. In order to set the tone, you should know that the Mazda's 150 horsepower is about 35 more than the other two entrants. The Mazda also earned points for its quiet motor (it sounds more like a petrol engine, the host says), standard equipment that would add about $4,000 to the other two cars if included and relative roominess in front and in back. The Audi gained points for its storage space, while the BMW had the only rear-wheel-drive car in the hunt. See for yourself how the competition stacks up. News Source: Auto Express via YouTube Green Audi BMW Mazda Diesel Vehicles bmw 1-series Auto Express
MotorWeek fondly remembers the 2000 BMW M5
Fri, May 15 2015The Retro Review series from MotorWeek tends to reminisce about vehicles at are at least 20 years old and often from even further back. However, the show's latest recollection shines the spotlight on a fondly remembered sports sedan that's also a modern classic: the 2000 BMW M5. Years before BMW committed to downsized engines with turbocharging and shortly prior to the introduction of iDrive, the E39 M5 showed the Bavarian brand's engineering talents at their very best. By modern standards, the sedan's powertrain is almost antiquated. Up front, there's a big, naturally aspirated V8 that sends power to the rear wheels, and the only choice of transmission is a six-speed manual. But as MotorWeek explains, the tuning of the whole vehicle comes out to near perfection. This is a model that's definitely worth remembering.
2015 BMW M3 Sedan
Tue, 20 May 2014BMW's all-new M3 Sedan is dynamically nearly identical to its two-door M4 Coupe sibling: a stopwatch reveals that both are sub-four-second cars to 60 miles per hour, a racetrack proves that the mechanical twins are equally as adept on a road course and a full afternoon of driving on public roads demonstrates that each possesses talented everyday adaptability.
Yet after driving both BMW models back-to-back over two full days in Portugal, it's clear there are a few noticeable differences, both objective and subjective, that don't require instrument testing to reveal. All it takes is a few hours behind the wheel of both cars to conclude that one is slightly more agile, and the other a bit more twitchy. One has better outward visibility, while its counterpart is unquestionably more convenient.
It is the little things - subtleties attained through seat-of-the-pants observations - that eventually allow me to choose a favorite.