2011 Audi A4 2.0t Premium Quattro on 2040-cars
508 W Carmel Dr, Carmel, Indiana, United States
Engine:2.0L I4 16V GDI DOHC Turbo
Transmission:8-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): WAUFFAFL2BN045590
Stock Num: CM-045590
Make: Audi
Model: A4 2.0T Premium quattro
Year: 2011
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Cardamom Beige
Options: Drive Type: AWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 25355
Visit Carmel Motors online at www.carmel-motors.com to see more pictures of this vehicle or call us at 866-578-8643 today to schedule your test drive. FINANCING AVAILABLE ON ALL TYPES OF CREDIT !!!!! TO GET PRE APROVED APLLY ONLINE AT WWW.CARMEL-MOTORS.COM Visit Carmel Motors online at www.carmel-motors.com to see more pictures of this vehicle or call us at 866-578-8643 today to schedule your test drive. FINANCING AVAILABLE ON ALL TYPES OF CREDIT !!!!! TO GET PRE APROVED APLLY ONLINE AT WWW.CARMEL-MOTORS.COM
Audi A4 for Sale
2004 audi a4 3.0 quattro(US $8,522.00)
2006 audi a4 1.8t(US $8,995.00)
2008 audi a4 3.2 quattro(US $14,900.00)
2005 audi a4 2.0t quattro(US $12,200.00)
1996 audi a4 2.8(US $3,995.00)
2011 audi a4 2.0t avant premium plus quattro(US $26,990.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
Widco Transmissions ★★★★★
Townsend Transmission ★★★★★
Tom`s Midwest Muffler & Brake ★★★★★
Superior Auto ★★★★★
Such`s Auto Care ★★★★★
Shepherdsville Discount Auto Supply ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Nissan GT-R Track Pack squares off against Audi R8 V10 Plus
Wed, 22 May 2013The team over at Motor Trend has pitted the new Audi R8 V10 Plus against the Nissan GT-R. While both of the bright red all-wheel-drive supercars are comparably matched in power output, the similarities end there. Audi offers a mid-engine aluminum coupe with a naturally aspirated V10 that spits out 550 horsepower. Nissan shows up with a more traditional coupe equipped with a 545-horsepower twin-turbocharged V6 at the front of the car.
The Head-to-Head video takes both cars to the Streets of Willow Springs in the California desert for some track work with professional racing driver Randy Pobst behind the wheel. After a day at the track, the pair head to the local mountains for some spirited real-world driving. One dominates on the circuit, while the other earns back its credibility in the canyons. We won't tell you which coupe comes out on top, but we think you may be surprised. Follow the link below to watch for yourself.
2015 Audi A3 Sportback E-Tron
Wed, 18 Dec 2013A little more than a year ago, I drove an Audi A3 E-Tron prototype - an early concept electric vehicle built on the outgoing second-generation A3 platform. While I was impressed with the technology, its 3,800-pound weight, 10-second 0-60 time and 90-mile range will likely put it only mid-pack, at best, among its future competitive set. But Audi promised bigger and better things would come.
I didn't have to wait long. Immediately following the Los Angeles Auto Show, Audi asked me come drive its all-new successor built on the company's third-generation A3 chassis. Compared to last year's model, the new plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) boasts a lighter curb weight, quicker acceleration and six times the range. Calling it improved is an understatement. Best of all, it's heading to production.
Technically speaking, the 2015 Audi A3 Sportback E-Tron is a parallel hybrid, meaning its electric motor is sandwiched between a combustion engine and an automatic transmission - either, or both, is capable of powering the front wheels. The gasoline-powered engine is a direct-injected and turbocharged 1.4-liter four-cylinder, rated at 150 horsepower. The transmission is a six-speed dual-clutch gearbox. A 75-kW electric motor sits between the two. Water is used to cool the gasoline engine, the electric motor and the battery pack - there are three independent closed loops.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.