**look** Ford F 150 Extended Cab Flareside Short Box With Many Extras!!! on 2040-cars
Lakefield, Minnesota, United States
Engine:5.4L V8 EFI
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): flareside superb 2 door
Make: Ford
Model: F-150
Options: 6 disc CD Player, Cassette Player
Trim: Lariat XLT
Safety Features: Factory Remote Start, Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Running bars, Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Drive Type: 4 WD
Mileage: 109,567
Exterior Color: White / Tan
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
3000 lb overload springs: $350.00 Installed in 2007
Deluxe RETRAX keylock Cover: $1300.00 installed in 2009
This vehicle is a great buy. I am the 3rd owner and I bought it in April of 2007 from Dewey Ford in Ankeny, IA.
Ford F-150 for Sale
- 2007 ford f150 lariat extended cab 5.4l v8 4x4 leather moonroof clean carfax
- 1981 ford f150 custom
- 2013 ford f-150
- 2001 ford f-150 4x4 low 31k miles 5 speed manual , no reserve
- 1993 svt lightning ford f-150 xlt pickup(US $5,500.00)
- 2010 ford f-150 lariat supercrew sunroof blk on blk 36k texas direct auto(US $28,980.00)
Auto Services in Minnesota
Zumbrota Ford ★★★★★
Vrooom Auto Care ★★★★★
Reliance Electric Motors ★★★★★
R & S Collision Services Inc ★★★★★
R & D Motors ★★★★★
Pearsons Prior Lake Auto Collision ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford faces class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles without brake override systems
Fri, 29 Mar 2013A total of 20 Ford customers are suing the automaker in a class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles "vulnerable to unintended acceleration." According to Reuters, the suit names 30 models built between 2002 and 2010 with electronic throttle control systems but without a brake override system. Those include the 2004-2012 F-Series pickups and the 2005-2009 Lincoln Town Car. Adam Levitt, a partner with the law firm of Grant & Eisenhofer says the plaintiffs in the case want "to be compensated for their economic losses by having overpaid for cars that contained defects." Levitt contends that the plaintiffs would not have bought their vehicles or paid less for them had they known there was no brake override system in place.
Ford began installing brake override systems in its vehicles beginning in 2010. In response to the lawsuit, Ford has pointed to research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that indicated that unintended acceleration is mostly caused by driver error, saying in a statement that, "NHTSA's work is far more scientific and trustworthy than work done by personal injury lawyers and their paid experts."
Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co. will be heard in US District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia.
Automakers tussle over owners of 'orphan' makes
Thu, 10 May 2012When General Motors put down several of its brands in recent years, it also let loose thousands of brand-loyal customers who will eventually need another car.
R.L. Polk Associates estimates there are more than 18 million cars from 16 discontinued makes on the road today. Those "orphan owners" have sales-hungry competitors seeing dollar signs. GM is offering Saturn owners $1,000 cash toward a Chevy Cruze, Cadillac CTS or a GMC Acadia. Ford is giving its Mercury lease customers a chance to get out of their contracts with no early-termination penalty and offering to waive six remaining payments if they drive off in a Ford or Lincoln.
Edmunds.com research shows the efforts are paying off somewhat for GM, with 39 percent of Pontiac owners, 37 percent of Hummer owners and 31 percent of Saturn owners taking delivery of another GM-branded vehicle. But that leaves as much as 69 percent of owners going elsewhere. Ford, Honda and Toyota seem to be attracting many former GM owners.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.