Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1989 Ford Ranger Extended Cab on 2040-cars

Year:1989 Mileage:216000
Location:

SINGLE OWNER VEHICLE. THE PICTURES WERE TAKEN BEFORE WINTER SO A WAX AND POLISH WILL BE NEEDED TO RESTORE TO THE CONDITION IN THE PICTURES. 

NICE INSIDE.....GOOD USED TIRES.....NEW CLUTCH AND PRESSURE PLATE....MOTOR WAS REBIULT AT 210,000 MILES BUT HAS DEVELOPED A TICK WITH THE VALVES AFTER 6,000 MILES FOLLOWING REBUILD....DOESNT SMOKE.....THERE APPEARS TO BE A MISMATCH BETWEEN THE STARTER ANDS RING GEAR, POSSIBLY SHIMS NEEDED BEHIND FLYWHEEL.... ALTHOUGH GETS ON DOWN THE ROAD NOW WHEN STARTER ALIGNED, I WOULDNT RECOMMEND IT FOR LONG UNTIL VALVES CAN BE ADJUSTED......OVERALL THIS IS A NICE 1989 RANGER. THERE IS SLIGHT RUST AT THE RIGHT REAR WHEEL WELL. I WILL REPLACETHE HEADLINER IF IT DOESN'T SELL.

I JUST DON'T HAVE THE TIME TO PUT INTO THE TRUCK RIGHT NOW WHICH IS WHY I AM SELLING IT.

NEW PARTS INCLUDE::

WINDSHIELD

CLUTCH, PRESSURE PLATE, THROWOUT BEARING AND SLAVE CYLINDER

BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER

TIMING CHAIN AND GEARS

HEAD BOLTS AND HEAD GASKETS

OIL PUMP AND PICKUP TUBE

CRANKSHAFT AND MAIN BEARINGS

CAMSHAFT

ROD BEARINGS

LIFTERS

PUSHRODS

ROCKER ARMS AND ROCKER ARM SHAFTS

RINGS

VALVE COVER GASKET

WATER PUMP

OIL PAN GASKET






 

Auto blog

EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate

Mon, 26 Aug 2013


The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.

Ford F-Series Super Duty prototype reduced to smoldering mess of aluminum and steel [UPDATE]

Mon, 04 Aug 2014

The most important bit of information you need to know after looking through our high-res gallery of images depicting a prototype 2016 Ford F-Series Super Duty pickup truck burning to the ground is that nobody was hurt. There were two engineers inside the vehicle when it caught fire, and both exited to safety.
That's the good news. The bad news is that the truck, which appears to have been testing in Death Valley, appears to be a total loss, minus, of course, whatever information Ford can glean from the conflagration - particularly tracing it back to its root cause. Besides that, we're also expecting the body of the next Super Duty to be hewn from aluminum, as is the case with its smaller brother, the brand-new F-150. Note the little aluminum droppings littering the roadway as apparent proof of that.
Our spy photographers report that it took just 21 minutes for the F-Series Super Duty to burn completely to the ground. The fire appears to have started in the driver-side front wheel well, spreading to engulf the entire front end in three minutes. We can't confirm the source of the blaze, but we're curious if the car's black vinyl cladding, meant to obscure the secrets within, contributed to the fire.

Ford dinged by OSHA for asbestos at Buffalo plant

Sat, 20 Jul 2013

Ford has come under fire from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for violations regarding asbestos exposure in a company metal stamping plant in Buffalo, NY. OSHA has cited Ford for eight violations in total, according to an Automotive News report, and faces fines of up to $41,800. 537 workers are employed at the stamping facility.
The violations include a pipefitter at the facility being exposed to asbestos-containing material while working on a steam line, other workers exposed to the material without respiratory protection and work areas that were not designed to limited the number of workers in contact with asbestos. Further, areas in which asbestos was present were not properly restricted, and levels of asbestos in the air were not monitored.
According to an unnamed Ford spokesperson in the AN report, the company feels that the OSHA citation is erroneous saying, "We have fully cooperated with the local OSHA officials and we don't believe the citations are warranted." Ford also maintains that it will work with the authorities to resolve the issue.