Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Chevy Ii Nova - 4 Door Sedan on 2040-cars

Year:1966 Mileage:27500
Location:

McKinney, Texas, United States

McKinney, Texas, United States
Advertising:

 

1966 Chevy II Nova / 4 Door car / all original body parts.

 

 

Nice project card for Dad and Son

 

 

This is an untouched unrestored survivor with surface rust only.

The car was Sold and Raised in Texas with very low option for 1966 It has a 235 6-Cylinder, 3 Speed on the Column.  It was sold in Sherman Texas 10/5/1966 lived in Pilot Point Texas.

 

The body has surface rust with the worst being by back window on driver side. The floor boards are solid and all sheet metal looks very solid also. The Trunk is in great original shape with no rust inside. All windows roll up and down with ease, doors open and shut with like they should. The Odometer shows 27,500 miles on it and it runs like these may be actual miles. Runs and Drives very good for a 48 year old car.

 

 

What Car needs

  • Front Shocks are wet… they need to be replaced

  • Back Shocks are tired… they need to be replaced

  • Bench seat and Rear seat  needs reupholstered

  • Headliner is good shape for being original – has holes in it, but not ripped up

  • All lights work – Right turn will not cancel automatically (easy Fix)

  • Horns work but Spring in missing on Horn Button (Easy Fix)

  • Windshield Washers doesn’t work, need new diaphragm on motor (Easy Fix)  

  • Buick chrome Wheels with  195/R75-14 tires (Good Shape)

 

 

What has been done

  • Manual Brakes – Master cylinder, Wheel cylinders, lines have been replaced

  • Replaced Carburetor , fuel pump, sending unit, fuel filters

  • Replaced Distributor with an Electronic  Distributor

  • New Spark Plugs and wiring

  • New Headlights (One of the original T3 went bad when driving it)

 

Plus For a 48 Year old car

  • 3 on the Tree shifts like it should – Smooth

  • Original Owner Manual

  • Original Custom Feature Accessories brochure for 1966

  • Original Owner Protection Plan Book with Protect-O-Plate

  • Original Lighter – Car was never smoked in – Ash Tray in clean

  • AM Radio Works - Pre Set Buttons works

  • Clean Title

  •  No leaks or smoke

 I have drove this car about 900 miles since I got it... I feel you could drive it home anywhere in the U.S. Buyers can see and drive car before buying. For more information or Pictures, Please call me @ 972-849-0472


Thanks for Looking

 


On Apr-08-14 at 12:22:09 PDT, seller added the following information:

I had a question about the paint on right doors... Here is my Response to Ebayer:

There has been body work on rear door below the chrome... The door, door jam and rocker panel looks original. I totally want to be honest about car. Nothing to hide. Thanks

Auto Services in Texas

Zepco ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Speedometers, Truck Equipment, Parts & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 508 N Central Expy, Murphy
Phone: (972) 690-1052

Z Max Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1705 W Division St, Arlington
Phone: (817) 460-3555

Young`s Trailer Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Trailer Hitches
Address: 11th, Gruver
Phone: (806) 374-8171

Woodys Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6106 N Dixie Blvd, Gardendale
Phone: (432) 362-1669

Window Magic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: Hockley
Phone: (281) 362-0640

Wichita Alignment & Brake ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 1200 31st St, Holliday
Phone: (940) 322-1919

Auto blog

1983 Motorweek showdown pits Porsche 928S vs. Chevy Camaro Z28

Mon, Jan 12 2015

Last month, Motor Trend threw the Camaro Z/28 and Porsche 911 GT3 into the bear pit and let them fight it out. Way back in 1983, MotorWeek had the same idea, comparing the Camaro Z/28 to the Porsche 928S. At the time, the Camaro was America's best selling sports coupe, the 928S was Porsche's top-of-the-line model that also had the highest top speed of any car sold here. And the price differential was even more stark then: $13,600 for the Camaro, $45,000 for the Porsche. That put the Z/28's cast-iron, 5.0-liter V8 with 190 horsepower and 240 pound-feet of torque against the all-aluminum 4.7-liter V8 with 234 hp and 263 lb-ft in the 928S. Even with that and the Camaro being 14 inches longer than the Porsche, the American was a surprising 40 pounds lighter than the German. The show took them to Summit Point Raceway in West Virginia to see how close a relative performance bargain could hang with a the German GT. Both had five-speed manual transmissions, but the high-speed corners and tight sections of Summit Point would test other handling variables, including the "bone-rattling" Camaro's solid rear axle and disc and drum brake setup vis-a-vis the four-wheel disc brakes and independent suspension on the "firm-but-smooth" Porsche. Paradoxically, the larger disparity 22 years ago resulted in a closer result. Check out the video to see how the Summit was won. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Porsche Coupe Luxury Performance Classics Videos chevy camaro z28 porsche 928 retro review

Camaro spy shots show subtly different grille, front fascia

Sun, 03 Feb 2013

It looks like there some changes in store for the Chevrolet Camaro - the only thing is that we just don't know what Chevy has up its sleeve. Looking at these spy shots, we'd initially be inclined to think that there is just a minor facelift or a new special edition, but upon closer inspection, there are a few oddities about this car that definitely have us intrigued.
The most obvious difference on this prototype is the slightly restyled front fascia with a smaller lower air inlet and the two-bar grille. Then we get to some of the car's mysterious details. For starters, this fascia has the SS vent above the grille, but it looks to be blocked off. Granted this could just be a one-off piece used for testing. What really piqued our interest was at the rear of the car where it has quad exhaust outlets that are used on the ZL1. Could this be the LS7-powered Camaro that we reported on back in December?
At this point, your guess is as good as ours as to what we're looking at here, so let us know in the comments what you think this could be.

GM finds steering flaw, decides it doesn't warrant a recall

Tue, Apr 14 2015

Guess what? General Motors is back in the spotlight for not recalling something. This time, though, not only does the company have an argument against a recall campaign, but its position is supported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. According to The New York Times, over 50 owners of GM vehicles have reported instances of stuck or seized steering after driving long distances without moving the wheel. One owner complained to NHTSA that the "locked" steering of their 2013 Buick Verano caused a collision with a concrete barrier in a construction zone. Along with the 2013 to 2014 model year Verano sedans, Chevrolet Cruze and Malibu sedans are also affected. Considering the popularity of those models, GM needs to have a reason for not issuing a recall, right? "Based on a very low rate of occurrence – ranging from less than one half to less than two incidents per thousand vehicles – and the fact that the condition is remedied when the wheel is turned, GM determined this was not a safety issue," spokesman Alan Adler told The Times. The company has, however, issued a technical service bulletin for owners that complain of the problem. The fix is nothing more than a software update that is covered for 10 years or 150,000 miles from new. NHTSA cited GM's actions, along with descriptions of the problems from customers, in its decision not to issue a recall, with spokeswoman Catherine Howden saying, "the symptoms described would be a brief, perceptible change in steering feel that has little to no effect on the driver's ability to safely steer the vehicle." "When terms like 'notchy,' 'stick,' 'slip' or 'feel' are used, it does not indicate a meaningful increase in steering effort," Howden told The Times via email. What do you think? Is GM in the wrong here? Should there be a recall, or is the issue so limited as to not warrant one? Have your say in Comments. Featured Gallery 2013 Buick Verano Turbo: Review View 20 Photos Related Gallery 2014 Chevrolet Malibu: First Drive View 36 Photos Related Gallery 2014 Chevrolet Cruze Turbo Diesel: Quick Spin View 14 Photos News Source: The New York TimesImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Steven J. Ewing, Seyth Miersma / AOL Government/Legal Recalls Buick Chevrolet GM Safety Sedan buick verano